Through the Bible with Les Feldick, Book 32
LESSON ONE * PART I
PAUL'S GLIMPSE OF GLORY
II CORINTHIANS 11:22 - GALATIANS 1:7
Now as we begin this new book let me pause for a moment and say thank you again
for all the support that you have given us, and especially your prayers. We
know that we cannot do this in the energy of the flesh. Now picking up where we
left off in the last program, and that will be in Chapter 11:22. Remember,
as we begin, Paul has to constantly remind not only the Corinthians, but you
and I as well, that he was the God-ordained apostle of the Gentiles, the
non-Jew and he has to constantly defend that. Even the Corinthians which
were probably a mixture of some Jews but still mostly Gentiles, were evidently
bombarding him with the accusation that, after all, he didn't have the
authority that Peter, James and John had because they had been with Christ for
three years.
II Corinthians 13:3a
"Since ye seek a proof of Christ speaking in me,..."
But Paul will show us that he also had direct contact with Christ. Not in the
way that the Twelve had in walking up and down the dusty roads of Palestine,
but nevertheless the Lord has appeared to this apostle over and over and
especially, as we're going to see today, to give him encouragement in spite of
all the sufferings and disappointments that he had to go through. As we come
into verse 22 of Chapter 11 he is again coming back to this same point. Those
Twelve back there in Israel didn't have anything over him because look what he
says.
II Corinthians 11:22
"Are they Hebrews? so am I. Are they Israelites? so am I. Are they the
seed of Abraham? so am I."
So with regard to genealogy they didn't have anything over the apostle Paul,
because he, too, was all of these. Now verse 23:
II Corinthians 11:23a
"Are they ministers of Christ? [now here is where Paul's humility
shows through, and this is the only reason he says this, because he is always
saying `I'm nothing.'] (I speak as a fool) I am more;..."
How could the man say that? Because of the revelations that he had received,
not from the pre-crucified Christ, but the Christ after His death, burial,
resurrection, and ascension. And that makes all the difference in the
world. I've made the point that if you made a will back in 1980 and covered
everything, dotting every `i'and crossing every `t,' but then in 1990 you had
some changes, you would write a new will then. Then, say, in 1992 you pass away
and they go into your personal items and find two wills, one dated in 1980 (in
which everything's in order), and another one dated 1990 (just as signed and
dated), well which one do the courts look at? The last one, and that is much
the same way with Paul's apostleship. He had not walked with Christ as the
Twelve did, but he had further revelations at a later time and as he says
over and over, they now become the primary apostle.
Now we're going to see it again even in Chapter 12, but for example let's just
jump ahead in verse 11, and again he used the word `fool' merely to show the
fact that he has no pride in himself. He did not have an ego problem.
II Corinthians 12:11
"I am become a fool in glorying; ye have compelled me: (because
of their constant resistance to his authority he has to come back and prove it.
He says. `you're the ones that are causing me to say all this, because you
won't believe me.') for I ought to have been commended of you: for in
nothing am I behind the very chiefest apostles, (Peter, James and John)
though I be nothing."
They were what I call the inner sanctum of the Twelve. But Paul says that he is
even ahead of them. Now go all the way back to Chapter 11 and you'll find the
same thing in verse 5. Now here we have this three times in the space of a
chapter, you might say where the Holy Spirit led him to say the same thing. And
what have I told you ever since we started in Genesis? When the Scripture
repeats something several times in a rather short span it's there for emphasis,
and we'd better take note of it. All right now look what it says back in
Chapter 11 verse 5:
II Corinthians 11:5
"For I suppose I was not a whit behind, the very chiefest
apostles."
Do you see that? So three times now he is making the point that Peter, James,
and John were not above him, in fact it's just the other way around. They have
slipped off the scene, and now this man is God's chosen vessel to take the
Gospel of Grace not just to the Nation of Israel, but to the whole world. Now
coming back where we left off in Chapter 11.
II Corinthians 11:23
"Are they ministers of Christ? (I speak as a fool) I am more; in labours
more abundant, in stripes above measure, in prison more frequent, in deaths
oft."
Now let's stop for a moment. How much physical suffering did the Twelve
disciples go through until they were finally martyred? As far as we know, none.
Certainly not during Christ's earthly ministry. Now we know they were all
martyred, I take nothing away from that. But for this man throughout the whole
20 years of his ministry it was nothing but one beating after another. One
imprisonment after another, and it was constant opposition from his own
countrymen the Jews. And so for a whole 20-year period the man suffered only
for the sake of the Gospel, and the Twelve didn't have to do that. Now we're
going to see in Chapter 12 that he was dragged out of Lystra for dead, but
evidently there were other times when, so far as the apostle was concerned, he
was next to death whether it was through sickness or through the beatings or
through imprisonment or whatever. Now verse 24:
II Corinthians 11:24
"Of the Jews five times received I forty stripes save one."
In other words, they would stop at 39. The Law said 40, but in order to make
sure they didn't miscount and to be on the safe side they would stop at 39. But
you know what? Very few victims could take that many, and usually the chief
priest would have to stop the whipper before they would get up to that point.
Most men couldn't take that many stripes, they would die as they were being
whipped. You and I, in our modern age, have no concept of what a human being
looked like after they had been beaten 39 times.
Stoning was even worse. I was reading the other night in a biography on the
apostle Paul how, when the Jews stoned someone to death, the corpse was
obscene. It stands to reason that is correct as they would use rocks so big
that it would take two hands to smash it down on the victim. And by the time
they were through with them they were literally pummeled to where they were
obscene. All right, the apostle went through that also, so we have to
constantly remember (as we sit now in our western culture and most of us for
sure have never had to suffer for our faith yet in order for us to have our New
Testament as we know it), this is what the man had to go through. Now there was
some reasoning for it and it goes back to the old saying. "What goes around,
comes around." Remember for several years this man did the same things to his
victims. He was unmerciful to his fellow Jews because they had believed in
Jesus of Nazareth. And that's why God told Ananias there in Damascus:
Acts 9:16
"For I will shew him (Saul) how great things he must suffer
for my name's sake."
I'm bringing all this out to get you ready for Chapter 12, because we're going
to have a tremendous experience in that chapter. So here he's been suffering at
the hands of the Jews, at the hands of the Romans.
II Corinthians 11:25
"Thrice was I beaten with rods, once was I stoned, thrice I suffered
shipwreck, a night and a day I have been in the deep;"
The Book of Acts only records one shipwreck so there must have been two other
times he was dumped in the water. And the same way with these beatings. I can
only find once in the Book of Acts where the Jews gave him the 39 stripes, and
yet he says that they did that to him five times. Three times he was beaten
with rods and that's almost as bad. Then once he was stoned and that's the one
we will look at in Chapter 12. Now verse 26:
II Corinthians 11:26,27
"In journeying often, (remember the man covered what is now
Turkey and Greece on foot) in perils of waters, in perils of robbers, in
perils by mine own countrymen, in perils by the heathen (the non-Jewish
world) in the city, in perils in the wilderness, in perils in the sea, in
perils among false brethren; 27. In weariness and painfulness, in watchings
often, in hunger and thirst, in fastings often in cold and
nakedness."
We've had it pretty good haven't we? I don't think any of us have gone through
any of this for the sake of the Gospel. If the Lord doesn't come back soon, the
day may come, as we never know what the future holds. We do know that right
now, today, thousands of Christians are being tortured and put to death. Some
are sold into slavery in other parts of the world. In fact I was reading that
since 1900 more Christians have been martyred than all then rest of time back
to the time of Christ. Now we don't realize that.
But remember that communism held forth in Russia for 70 years, and it was
ruthless. The Nazis in Germany were ruthless, and the Chinese have been
ruthless and still are. In Africa we have no idea of the amount of Christian
people who have suffered for their faith. So here we sit in America, and we're
so blessed with all of our liberties, and freedoms, and our guarantees of
freedom, and too often we do not stop to think that this is a rare commodity
that we hold in our hands. This is something that too many areas of the world
would just love to be able to do. To be able to sit down without fear and study
the Word of God. So let's never fail to thank God that we are in such a place
of liberty and opportunity. Now verse 28, and remember on top of all these
hardships he had other concerns.
II Corinthians 11:28
"Beside those things that are without, that which cometh upon me daily,
the care (or the concerns) of all the churches."
(assemblies)
I like the word `assemblies' better for Churches. That meant wherever he went
he would establish a small assembly of believers. It was usually in a home, and
it was called the local church. As reports would come back to him (that maybe
some false teachings and vile sin had come into that congregation), we know
that it just tore at the man. Now verse 29.
II Corinthians 11:29
"Who is weak, and I am not weak? who is offended, and I burn
not?"
In other words, Paul identified with all these converts that he had brought out
of paganism, or Judaism.
II Corinthians 11:30-32a
"If I must needs glory, I will glory of the things which concern mine
infirmities. (his weaknesses) 31. The God and Father of our Lord
Jesus Christ, which is blessed for evermore, knoweth that I lie not. 32. In
Damascus..."
In Damascus where it all started as we find back there in Acts Chapter 9, where
Saul of Tarsus met the Lord on the road, was blinded, and then led into
Damascus. After he got his sight back, and got food, remember how he went into
the Synagogue and proclaimed that Jesus was the Christ.
Acts 9:20
"And straightway he preached Christ in the synagogues, that he is the Son
of God."
Remember how I put it back there in the Book of Acts? Well you see that message
was no longer sufficient. God was going to turn from the Jew only and let the
Gentiles be the primary players. It was not the message that God wanted this
man to preach. It was not enough to simply believe that Jesus was the Christ,
the Son of God. God had further revelations to give this man. So there in
Damascus God forced the issue. What happened? Oh, the word got out that there
were people who were ready to put him to death. There were Jews who understood
that he had turncoated on them. So he had to flee for his life, being let down
over the wall in a basket, and then God took him to Arabia for three years for
those revelations of the mysteries. But here in II Corinthians is what Paul is
making reference to. He says right from the very beginning his whole life of
fear and suffering began.
II Corinthians 11:32,33
"In Damascus the governor under Aretas the king kept the city of the
Damascenes with a garrison, desirous to apprehend me: 33. And through a window
in a basket was I let down by the wall, and escaped his hands."
Now that's the way to start a career isn't it? Right off the bat he has to
start running for his life. Well it was all part and parcel, you see, of
getting the man ready for the Gospel of Grace as we know it today. That
Christ died for our sins, and He was not left in the grave, He's alive
evermore, He arose from the dead. And that's our Gospel that we believe for
salvation as we find in I Corinthians 15:1-4. Paul is going to take this Gospel
to the ends of the then-known world.
And today, even with all of this in Paul's writings in the New Testament, that
Gospel is so shunned. We just do not hear the uniqueness of Paul's apostleship.
What a sad commentary because this is where we are going to find eternal life.
It's the very heart of our New Testament from Romans through Hebrews, and this
is why I'm always stressing the fact that this man was brought into all of this
suffering and turmoil so that you and I as Gentiles can have this tremendous
Gospel of the Grace of God. Now let's move into Chapter 12. Keep in mind two
basic points that I've been trying to make throughout II Corinthians. How that
he has to defend his apostleship. That he does have the authority even though
he did not walk with Christ up and down the roads of Palestine. Paul had that
apologetic authority. The second one was that we're not under Law, but rather
Grace. So these things are going to be preeminent in his writings not only to
the Corinthians but as we go on through the other letters.
II Corinthians 12:1
"It is not expedient for me doubtless to glory. I will come to visions
and revelations of the Lord."
In the next verse he says something that I suppose a lot of people just gloss
over (and they really don't know what he's talking about).
II Corinthians 12:2
"I knew (know) a man in Christ above (or about)
fourteen years ago, (whether in the body, I cannot tell; or whether out
of the body, I cannot tell: God knoweth;) such an one caught up to the third
heaven."
Now there is so much in this verse that I hardly know where to go back in our
references first. But I think we'll go back to the time that he is referring to
and that would be back in the Book of Acts Chapter 14. This was on Paul's first
missionary journey. But he's gone up into central Turkey on that first
missionary journey, and at the little city of Lystra he had performed a
miracle. You would have thought that would have settled everything but rather
it got everyone in an uproar because they thought he was a god. But it turned
on him and when they suddenly realized that he wasn't a god, they came
violently against him. And the Jews were leading the mob.
Acts 14:19
"And there came thither certain Jews from Antioch and Iconium,
(these were cities close together) who persuaded the people, and, having
stoned Paul, (according the Jewish system of execution) drew
(probably use a rope to drag) him out of the city, (of
Lystra) supposing he had been dead."
Remember the ancients weren't that stupid. They had a good idea when life was
still in the body, so I have to feel that for all practical purposes Paul died
as a result of this stoning.
Acts 14:20
"Howbeit, as the disciples stood round about him, (don't forget
what I told you about people who were stoned. Their corpse was so crushed and
mutilated and yet this is miraculous. We don't know how many hours he laid
there with his fellow believers in a dither of what to do.) he rose up,
and came into the city: (I think if I'd been him I would have headed in
the other direction,) and the next day he departed with Barnabas to
Derbe."
Now if you will come back to II Corinthians. The reason I tie this with the
stoning in Lystra is because, chronologically, it fits. It was probably about
45 or 46 AD when Paul was on that first missionary journey, and we know that he
wrote II Corinthians in about 60 AD So chronologically it fits. It was at this
time that he experienced this tremendous opportunity to see the glories of
Heaven, Paradise. Now let's read on. He says:
II Corinthians 12:2b
"...(whether in the body, I cannot tell; or whether out of the body, I
cannot tell; God knoweth,) (well I think it's obvious to us that he was
out of the body. I think the body was the one laying outside of Lystra having
been stoned. So the soul and spirit took flight.) God knoweth;)
such an one caught up to the third heaven."
Now we're going to look at these three heavens in Scripture for a moment so
come with me to the Book of Genesis. There is the first heaven, the second, and
the third. Now the first heaven is what we would call the air or atmosphere -
the area where the birds fly, so we know what the Scripture is talking about.
The second area is what we now call space or the area of the stars and so
forth. The third one is Heaven as we know it. It the very abode of God.
Genesis 7:23a
"And every living substance was destroyed which was upon the face of the
ground, both man, and cattle, and the creeping things, and the fowl of the
heaven;..."
So it was already referred to in Genesis that the atmosphere is part of what
the Bible calls the first heaven.
_______
LESSON ONE * PART II
PAUL'S GLIMPSE OF GLORY
II CORINTHIANS 11:22 - GALATIANS 1:7
We'll pick right up where we left off, and were going back for a moment to II
Corinthians Chapter 12. Then we'll go back and look at our other reference with
regard to verse 2.
II Corinthians 12:2
"I know a man in Christ (in other words a true born again
believer) above fourteen years ago, (whether in the body, I cannot tell;
or whether out of the body, I cannot tell: God knoweth;) such an one caught up
to the third heaven."
I was in the process of showing how the Scriptures lay out all three of the
heavens. We looked at the verse about the first heaven in Genesis at the close
of the last lesson. Now if you will go back with me to the Book of Deuteronomy
Chapter 4. Remember the first heaven refers to our atmosphere. But the second
heaven is the area of the stars, and we get a view of that in verse 19.
Deuteronomy 4:19a
"And lest thou lift up thine eyes unto heaven, and when thou seest the
sun, and the moon, and the stars even all the host of heaven,..."
Now that's not the Heaven that we normally think of as the abode of God, but
rather the second heaven. It's not the area where the birds fly, and it's
certainly not the abode of God. Now if we can come back to II Corinthians we
will find that Paul will delineate the third Heaven as being Paradise. Again we
will chase down some Scriptures on Paradise. But for now II Corinthians Chapter
12, and going on into verse 3.
II Corinthians 12:3,4a
"And I knew such a man, (whether in the body, or out of the body, I
cannot tell: God knoweth;) 4. How that he was caught up into paradise, and
heard unspeakable words, which it is not lawful (or permitted)
for a man to utter..."(or repeat)
Now we have to get an understanding of Paradise in the Old Testament and New
Testament to realize that the apostle here is so in accord with all of
Scripture. You remember when we were teaching these things in the Old Testament
we taught that in the Old Testament economy the atonement Blood of Christ had
not yet been shed, and animals blood could not do anything but cover the
sin. So the Old Testament believer could not go up into the presence of God
when he died, but rather he went down into Paradise. We're going to show you
now that this is the right direction to look at it. Here in Matthew 12 we find
Christ is in His earthly ministry. Jesus is speaking.
Matthew 12:39,40
"But he answered and said unto them, `An evil and adulterous generation
seeketh after a sign; and there shall no sign be given to it, but the sign of
the prophet Jonas; 40. For as Jonas was three days
and three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days
and three nights in the heart of the earth.'"
So the moment Jesus died He went down, not up. So everything concerning
Paradise in the Old Testament economy until after Christ's resurrection was
down to this area in the center of the earth. We get another little
window of that in Luke Chapter 16:19. Now I'm sure you've all heard sermons on
this so I'm not showing you anything new. All of this helps us understand what
Paul now teaches with regard to Paradise compared to what it was in the Old
Testament and during Christ's earthly ministry.
Luke 16:19-23a
"There was a certain rich man, which was clothed in purple and fine
linen, and fared sumptuously every day: 20. And there was a certain beggar
named Lazarus, which was laid at his gate, full of sores. 21. And desiring to
be fed with the crumbs which fell from the rich man's table: moreover the dogs
came and licked his sores. 22. And it came to pass, that the beggar died, and
was carried by the angels into Abraham's bosom: the rich man also died, and was
buried; 23. And in hell..."
Hell in the Old Testament in the Hebrew word was 'Sheol,' in the Greek it was
Hades, in English it's hell. They all mean the same thing. All three of these
words ware simply the abode of those who had departed this life. A lot of
people go to churches who use the apostles creed, and they ask the question,
"What does it mean when we repeat our creed, and it says that we believe that
Jesus died, was buried, and descended into hell. Do you mean that Jesus when He
died went down into hell fire?" No He did not go into hell fire. But Jesus did
go down into the Paradise side of hell. And here is what I'm talking about in
this passage.
Luke 16:23-31
"And in hell he (the rich man) lift up his eyes, being in
torment, (he was an unbeliever) and seeth Abraham afar off, and
Lazarus in his bosom. (two believers) 24. And he cried and said,
`Father Abraham, (the rich man must have been a Jew to say that)
have mercy on me, and send Lazarus that he may dip the tip
of his finger in water, and cool my tongue: for I am
tormented in this flame.' 25. But Abraham (he, too, is in hell,
but not in the torment side but rather the Paradise side.) said, `Son,
remember that thou in thy lifetime receivedst thy good things, and likewise
Lazarus evil things: but now he is comforted, and thou art tormented. 26. And
beside all this, between us and you there is a great gulf fixed: so that they
which would pass from hence to you cannot; neither can they pass to us, that
would come from thence.' 27. Then he said, `I pray thee therefore, father, that
thou wouldest send him to my father's house: 28. For I have five brethren; that
he may testify unto them, lest they also come into this place of torment.' 29.
Abraham saith unto him, `They have Moses and the prophets; let them hear them.'
30. And he said, `Nay father Abraham; but if one went unto them from the dead,
they will repent.' 31. And he said unto him, `If they hear not Moses and the
prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead.'"
So remember in hell at that time one side was torment and the other side was
Paradise. Now come back for a moment to the Book of Ephesians Chapter 4, and
we'll see what happened. And while you're looking for Ephesians I'll remind you
of another statement that Jesus made from the Cross. And one of the thieves was
talking to Jesus.
Luke 23:42,43
"And he said unto Jesus, `Lord, remember me when thou comest into thy
kingdom.' 43. And Jesus said unto him, `Verily I say unto thee, Today shalt
thou be with me in paradise.'"
In Paradise that day they went down and joined the saints that were waiting for
this great work of atonement. Now since the atoning Blood had been shed and
Christ has spent these three days and nights in Paradise, now look what Paul
says happened.
Ephesians 4:8-10
"Wherefore he saith, `When he ascended up on high, [that is after
His resurrection] he led captivity captive, [well who had been in
captivity? Well those believing Old Testament saints. They were held in the
Paradise side of hell waiting for the atoning Blood. which had now been shed.]
and gave gifts unto men. 9. (Now that he ascended, what is it but that he
also descended first into the lower parts of the earth? 10. He that descended
is the same also that ascended up far above all heavens, that he might fill all
things.)"
See how that fits with Jesus' account in Matthew Chapter 12? And here Paul puts
the cap stone on it that before Jesus ascended to glory, He descended into
Paradise and took those who were captive with Him.
Now come back with me to II Corinthians Chapter 12. Now when Paul says that
when he went up to Paradise, you see this is confirmation of the fact that
Paradise is no longer down in the center of the earth, but now it's in glory.
In fact let's look for a moment at II Corinthians Chapter 5. Now here is the
lot of the present day believer when they die. It has been ever since Christ
ascended.
II Corinthians 5:8
"We are confident, I say, and willing rather to be absent from the body,
and to be present with the Lord."
Now if he's going to be present with the Lord, where is he hoping to go?
Paradise! Because Paradise is now in Heaven as we understand Heaven. Have you
got that? Now coming back to Chapter 12. Paul has now gotten a glimpse of
Heaven as we normally think of Heaven. With all of it's beauty, and no doubt
with all of the music. Now I love good music, and I think when we hear good
music here on earth that it's just a sampling of what we're going to experience
when we get to glory. Now, evidently, Paul had full exposure to all this. He
saw the glories, he heard the magnificent things as we see in verse 4.
II Corinthians 12:4
"How that he was caught up into paradise, (into the third
Heaven) and heard unspeakable words, which it is not lawful for a man to
utter."
In other words God said, "All right Paul I'm letting you see and hear, but
you can't repeat it, you have to keep it to yourself." Now verse 5.
II Corinthians 12:5,6
"Of such an one will I glory: yet of myself I will not glory, but in mine
infirmities. 6. For though I would desire to glory, I shall not be a
fool; (Paul is remembering what God had instructed) for I say the
truth: but now I forbear, lest any man should think of me above that which he
seeth me to be or that he heareth of me."
What's Paul saying? If God had permitted him to repeat what he had seen and
heard, what would the human race have done with the apostle Paul? They would
have worshipped him. The apostle Paul is just as human as you and I. Never does
Paul expect worship from any of his converts. He's not God. So this is one of
the failures of mankind, and this is why I'm sure that Noah's Ark has never
been discovered. You know what would have happened. The world would flock to
worship something like that, and the same way with many other things that God
has seen fit to keep hidden because of the way the human heart is. Well if Paul
could have rehearsed with any of his people, or even to the Roman world in
general, of what he had seen and heard they would have fallen down and
worshipped him, so God wouldn't permit that. So He put the stigma on Paul that
he couldn't repeat what he had seen and heard.
Now again this happened fourteen years back from where we are studying. Now put
all this together. When this man was going through intense suffering, from
whippings and so forth what do you think constantly sustained him? What he saw
and heard in glory. And on top of that how many times the Lord Jesus appeared
unto him like he did at Corinth, when the Lord said unto him, "Don't give up
Paul, I have a great number of people in this place." And the time they were
about to be shipwrecked on that trip to Rome and a lot of the prisoners were
about to be put to death for fear they would escape. That's when Paul just
brought everything under control and said, "Look, God has appeared to me and
not a life is going to be lost." So the Lord Jesus communicated with him often.
Paul had these things of the supernatural to compensate for all his trials and
all of his sufferings. Now you and I don't have that, but he did, and so when
he would come through these beatings he could just remind himself, "But just
look what I've got coming." Let's go back to the Book of Romans for a
moment and look at Chapter 8 and we'll begin with verse 18. Romans was probably
written about 10 years after Paul got a glimpse of glory. So now look how he
could write with full understanding, even though it's inspired by the Holy
Spirit.
Romans 8:18
"For I reckon that the sufferings of this present time (see how
plain that is now?) are not worthy to be compared with the glory which
shall be revealed in us."
Believers just can't seem to get that through their heads. Even though we may
shun a lot of the world's pleasures, and we may not enjoy some of the things
that the world thinks are enjoyable, is it worth it? Well you better believe
it. Because no matter what we suffer even if we suffered to the extent that the
apostle Paul suffered, we would still be able to say, "Oh but it's worth it
because of the glory that is waiting for us." And it's not just going to be
seventy years to compensate for seventy years down here, but rather it's
forever. Some pastor in our audience sent me a chart that he had made and an at
the very end of the chart he had eternity, ages upon ages, a time without end.
We may have to suffer yet some day, we don't know, but if we do that's what has
to hold us up. No matter how much we suffer it's going to be worth it all,
because of the glory that's going to be revealed to us someday. Now there is
also another scripture that we can use for this in I Corinthians Chapter 2. And
again, remember this was written long after this tremendous experience. And I'm
not taking away from the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. I feel every word in
this Book is Holy Spirit breathed, but remember, as men wrote their
personality, their personal feelings were also evident.
I Corinthians 2:9
"But as it is written, `Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have
entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that
love him.'"
What a promise, and God can't lie. So we can rest on it that the day is coming
when we are going to experience things like what Paul had the privilege to see.
I think Paul was just bursting to tell us what he had seen back here in II
Corinthians Chapter 12. Oh how he would like to have shared at least some of
it, but he couldn't, and that's the reason because they would have worshipped
him. Now coming back to II Corinthians Chapter 12. To make sure that Paul never
forgot what does God do? Gives him a thorn in the flesh.
II Corinthians 12:7
"And lest I should be exalted above measure through the abundance of the
revelations,..."
See how plain that is when you know now what he is talking about? What was the
abundance of the revelations? Well, first the revelations of these doctrines of
Grace, the Gospel, and the Church Age teachings that he got to share, but on
top of that he got a glimpse of glory, a revelation, and the man is bursting to
tell about that experience. And yet God says in so many words, that, "I
don't want you to get the big head, I don't want you to get proud, and so I'm
going to give you a thorn in the flesh to keep you humble."
II Corinthians 12:7b
"...there was given to me a thorn in the flesh, the messenger of Satan to
buffet me, lest I should be exalted above measure."
Now the Greek makes it so much stronger. I'm not a Greek scholar, but a few of
these verses I go back and do a little study on. Do you know what Paul is
actually calling here this thorn in the flesh? It was like being crucified. It
was that kind of a constant pain. It was as if he was constantly suffering
crucifixion. Now that is what the Greek actually implies. In order to keep Paul
humble, the Lord had given him a thorn in the flesh that was like an impalement
that he had to live with: and he's already had it over fourteen years. And we
have to assume that he carried it to his death. Now there's a lot of
controversy from various points of view as to what his thorn in the flesh was.
Some of them are absurd, and some make some sense, but the one that I still
stand on is this: I think he had a vicious case of pink eye. It was very common
in the ancient world and they didn't have the antibiotics and so forth, and it
would lead to his repulsive appearance. Those matterly eyes effected his eye
sight as we see in the Book of Galatians.
Galatians 4:15
"Where is then the blessedness ye spake of? for I bear you record, that,
if it had been possible, ye would have plucked out your own eyes, and have
given them to me."
Why would they want to give him their eyes if he didn't have a need for them?
Then the next one is in Chapter 6.
Galatians 6:11
"Ye see how large a letter (large print) I have written
unto you with mine own hand."
Who uses large print? Blind people.
_______
LESSON ONE * PART III
PAUL'S GLIMPSE OF GLORY
II CORINTHIANS 11:22 - GALATIANS 1:7
Remember we were talking in our last lesson about Paul's thorn in the flesh
(which we do not claim to have the only answer). But a logical one for me is
that it was a common eye disease in that period of time and it was repulsive in
his appearance. It was painful and it limited his eye sight and, consequently,
I think that is the reason that he dictated all of his letters, seemingly,
except the Book of Galatians. And that's what I closed with in the last lesson,
how that he had to write the whole letter in huge block letters for his own
sake so that he could read it himself.
So as we come on down in Chapter 12 again let's start at verse 8. Here God
gives him the reason for keeping the man humbled and evidently putting him
through all the trials and sufferings.
II Corinthians 12:8,9a
"For this thing I besought the Lord thrice, (three times)
that it (this thorn in the flesh) might depart from me. 9. And he
(the Lord Jesus Himself) said unto me, `My grace is sufficient
for thee: for my strength is made perfect (or complete) in
weakness....'"
Again I have to take us back to I Corinthians because this is the whole concept
of Christian service. I don't mind a bit when, once in a while, someone will
say to me, "Les, the Lord is blessing your ministry so don't get the big head."
Because that's always a danger in any ministry, and don't think we don't know
that. The moment we think that we can do it ourselves we're all done. It has to
be done as a weak vessel that God has seen fit to use.
I Corinthians 1:26
"For ye see your calling, brethren, how that not many wise men after the
flesh, not many mighty, not many noble, are called:"
Now that says it all doesn't it? God doesn't go to the kings and queens of
world, nor does he usually go to the ivy covered halls of universities for his
servants. He never has. All you have to do is go back into the Old Testament
economy and look. Don't think for a moment that there weren't more highly
polished people to be used than Amos, Gideon, and Ezekiel and some of these
people. They were just common ordinary members of the Jewish nation, but that's
what God saw fit to use. So Paul is really an exception to the rule. Paul was
highly educated and no doubt had a lot of polish because he certainly moved in
the upper echelons of Judaism. This is why he constantly puts himself down as
nothing, because he realizes that God cannot use somebody unless they are
nothing.
Do you know the prime example for that situation in Scripture is Moses. Do you
remember back there in Exodus. Moses, at the end of his first 40 years, having
lived in Pharaoh's palace (and was the second top man in Egypt), what did he
think he could do? Well, he thought he could take the children of Israel out of
slavery because of his own power and pomp and circumstance, wisdom, and
leadership, so he went out to the children of Israel and as the Book of Acts
says:
Acts 7:25
"For he supposed his brethren would have understood how that God by his
hand would deliver them: but they understood not."
But you see God had to get Moses in the right position before He could use him.
See he was leaving God out of the picture, and was using his own position, and
what did God have to do to Moses? He took him out on the back side of the
desert and of all the things that the man could have done to make a living,
what does God put him in? A sheep herd. Which, in the eyes of an Egyptian, was
an abomination. That's what Moses had to become before God could use him. For
40 years, living with those smelly sheep with almost no contact with any number
of humans, and so he became a nothing. And when God finally approached him
there at the burning bush, what was Moses' first excuse? "Hey I can't talk."
Well for 40 years of practically being silent he'd almost forgotten how to
talk. But you see how far God had to take him before He could use him. Now the
same way with the apostle Paul. Remember he was highly educated, and had
studied at the feet of Gamaliel, the chief rabbi of that day, and of a wealthy
Jewish family. But what did God have to do? He had to take him down to a
nobody. Now reading verse 27. Instead of God choosing the noble one or the
highly educated:
I Corinthians 1:27,28
"But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the
wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things
which are mighty; 28. And base things of the world, and things which are
despised, hath God chosen, yea, and things which are not, to bring to nought
things that are."
I still remember a long time ago, when the lady called after seeing our program
for the first time, and her first question was, "Well who in the world are you
anyway?" Well, this humbles you and don't think it doesn't. I'm a nobody and I
still claim that, and that's why I feel God has seen fit to use us. God does
not use that which the world thinks is proper and has been rightly fitted for
service. Now verse 29, and here is given the same concept to why Paul was given
the thorn in the flesh.
I Corinthians 1:29,30
"That no flesh should glory (boast, or brag) in his
presence. (God won't have it.) 30. But of him are ye in Christ
Jesus, who of God is made unto us wisdom, and righteousness, and
sanctification, and redemption:"
Those are things that God accomplishes and no man can take credit for it. Now
coming back to II Corinthians Chapter 12. So rather in Paul's weakness under
the effect of this thorn in the flesh, whatever it was - under the effect of
constantly being misused, beatings, shipwrecked, in prison, cold, miserable,
hot, thirsty, you name it because the man went through it all, and only for the
sake of taking the Gospel to a lost world. That's all he could think about. Now
finishing verse 9:
II Corinthians 12:9b
"Most gladly therefore will I rather glory in my infirmities,
(his weaknesses) that the power of Christ may rest upon me."
Do you see what he's saying? Paul wasn't wishing for power and circumstance,
and political clout, he cared for none of that. But as long as he could be a
nobody, who could use him? God could. You know, the more I've been studying
with regard to these two letters to the Corinthians (and I hope I'm bringing it
home to you), the more I see the insurmountable odds that this man was facing
when he went into the absolutely strange territory of pagan Gentiles who knew
nothing of the God of this Bible. Oh the little Jewish communities of these
cities did, but the Jews never evangelize; the Jews never took their knowledge
out to the pagan Gentiles.
So when Paul comes into the cities that we talked about earlier as he traveled
on his missionary journeys, every one of these cities were abject pagan
idolaters who knew nothing of the God of creation. And on top of that, they
weren't even good people, they were rotten morally. You have no idea how
morally corrupt most of the cities in the Roman Empire were, it's unbelievable.
And yet it was into that kind of environment this man walked with no pleasant
appearance, with nothing physically going for him. All he did was preach Christ
crucified, and risen again, and those people turned from their idols and became
believers.
They were so staunch in their faith that they were willing to be martyred by
the hundreds, and they never wavered as Paul has shown over and over in his
writings. In spite of everything that those early believers went through, they
didn't give up, and how in the world did it happen? Well, it was the power of
God when the Gospel was preached. I think it's the same way today. Oh, I know
we're living in times when it seems like our moral fabric is just rotting away,
but when I read how things were in the Roman Empire, hey we're not that bad
yet, I believe that there is still hope. At least most of our American people
have a concept of God. I read recently that 2/3 of the American people are sure
that one day they're going to stand before God, now that's hard to believe
isn't it?
Remember Paul didn't have that kind of an advantage. He didn't approach people
who know that there was a God. He didn't approach people who had any concept of
Biblical morality. They were abject immorally, I mean blatantly immoral pagans.
And all he did was preach faith in the Gospel and they came out of that kind of
lifestyle. I was told by a gentlemen several years ago who had come out of a
pretty fast lane lifestyle (and he has been one of my students for at least 15
years now), "Les, do you realize that you never say a word against drinking,
smoking, cursing, gambling or illicit sex? You have never said a word against
any of that." I said, "Well, I didn't realize it." He said "Well, you don't
but you brought me out of all of that." How? By teaching the Word of God.
That's all it takes. You get people into the Word and you don't have to get on
them about whatever sins they may have committed because the Word takes care of
it. We're trying to somehow legislate all these problems, and trying to bring
people in on a guilt trip, and yeah, they've got to be found guilty, but by
realizing what the Word says. And this is exactly what Paul is after. Now
looking at the verse again.
II Corinthians 12:9b
"Most gladly therefore will I rather glory in my infirmities, that the
power of Christ may rest upon me."
Paul wasn't looking for some gimmick to get people's attention. He wasn't
looking for some Madison Avenue approach to get the masses to come and hear
him. But when he preached, in all of it's simplicity, people were convicted.
And as he said when he wrote to the Thessalonians (and this is what he
experienced everywhere he went. Simply because he preached Christ crucified,
buried, and risen from the dead. That's the power of the Gospel, and even
though we can't understand it, God in His own way will bring people to a
knowledge of the truth):
I Thessalonians 1:8,9
"For from you sounded out the word of the Lord not only in Macedonia and
Achaia, but also in every place your faith to God-ward is spread abroad; so
that we need not to speak any thing. (do you know what was happening?
As soon as Paul saw these people converted out of paganism what did they do?
They shared it wherever they went. They couldn't shut those people's mouths.)
9. For they themselves shew of us what manner of entering in we had unto
you, and how ye turned to God from idols to serve the living and true
God;"
Isn't that amazing? Here Paul could come into a pagan city with all of its
pagan statues and their gods and goddesses, and he would preach how God came in
the flesh and went to that Cross, and was raised from the dead, and they
believed it. Wonder of wonders. but they believed it. So, consequently, he had
so many converts that they accused him of turning the Roman world upside down.
Like one pastor I had years ago said, "Well it's just the other way around, he
turned it right side up." Anyway, there was such an impact from this one man
preaching the Gospel that the world in general said, "That man is turning the
empire upside down." And we know he did. Now coming back to II Corinthians
Chapter 12.
II Corinthians 12:12
"Truly the signs of an apostle were wrought among you in all patience, in
signs, and wonders, and mighty deeds. 13. For what is it wherein ye were
inferior to other churches, (assemblies) except it be that I
myself was not burdensome to you? forgive me this wrong."
Remember when Paul was asking for offerings? This is the one church that he did
not really come out and put any pressure on them to give. But rather he tried
to intimidate them by showing them that all the poor people up in the mountains
had already made collections for the poor saints in Jerusalem. And from these
Corinthians (many of whom were quite wealthy), he hadn't even asked for a dime,
and this is what he's coming back to. Then he tells them to, "forgive me
this wrong." That's a different way of approaching it isn't it? He
says, "It's really my fault. I should have made you aware that you should give
of your material wealth.
II Corinthians 12:14a
"Behold, the third time I am ready to come to you; and I will not be
burdensome to you: for I seek not yours, but you:..."
Paul wanted believers sold out to Christ. I dare say, myself included, that we
would all like to be totally sold out to God. But you see it is almost totally
impossible, it seems, for a man to be totally, completely sold out to God. But
this is what God is looking for. Now he won't demand it, He won't force us, but
oh, how God is looking for men and women, boys and girls who can be literally
be sold out to Him.
I think the apostle Paul probably did. You want to remember that he left all of
his material wealth behind him. He counted it but dung in order to take the
Gospel to the Gentile world. I've always said that I was sure that Paul had a
wife and family because he was a member of the Sanhedrin, and in order to be a
member of the Sanhedrin you had to have a family. You had to know how to deal
with family problems. As a result of this tremendous apostle being sold out to
Christ, he probably lost his wife. She probably turned against him (remember he
had been a high man in Jewish religion). Anyway Paul turned his back on
everything in order to take the Gospel to these pagan ungodly, immoral
Gentiles. Now verse 15.
II Corinthians 12:15
"And I will very gladly spend and be spent for you; though the more
abundantly I love you, the less I be loved."
Does that sound familiar? Oh does it ever. The more he loved those Corinthians
the more they turned against him and said, "We're not going to listen to that
man, now we're going to listen to Peter." After all Peter was with Christ,
where Paul never was. I showed this verse several months ago and had some calls
from people who said they never knew this verse was in their Bible. It might be
appropriate to stop and look at the verse again in II Timothy Chapter 1. You
know this must have been a heartache for the man. After all the sufferings,
beatings, imprisonment, and the shipwrecks, to simply take the Gospel to people
who had never heard it. He saw them established in it, saw Churches
established, but look what he says in this verse.
II Timothy 1:15a
"This thou knowest that all they which are in Asia (primarily
what is today Turkey) be turned away from me;..."
Now isn't that something? What had happened? Well I think that it wasn't that
they had pitched Christianity overboard, but I think they turned their back on
the apostle Paul's teaching of pure Grace and went back under so much of the
legalistic teaching and influence of Peter, James, John and the Jewish
community, as we're going to see when we get into the Book of Galatians. So,
what a heartache: all these little Churches that he suffered for and had spent
so much time with, and had been encouraged that they were growing in Grace and
knowledge - and yet as he now writes from prison in Rome just before he's
martyred that he has to make a statement like this. "...that all they
which are in Asia be turned away from me;..." They had rejected him. to
what extent I don't know. But remember the Scripture is true. They had not
remained true to the apostle who had brought them out of their paganism. Now
back to II Corinthians Chapter 12.
II Corinthians 12:16-18
"But be it so, I did not burden you: nevertheless, being crafty, I caught
you with guile. (Paul did use some strategy and he caught them in
places where they were failing ) 17. Did I make a gain of you by any of
them whom I sent unto you? (did they squeeze every dollar they could
out of you? No.) 18. I desired Titus, and with him I sent a brother. Did
Titus make a gain of you? walked we not in the same spirit? walked we not in
the same steps?"
In other words Titus didn't beg for money any more than Paul did. Now let's
wind up Chapter 12.
II Corinthians 12:21
"And lest, when I come again, my God will humble me among you, and that I
shall bewail many which have sinned already, and have not repented of the
uncleanness and fornication and lasciviousness which they have
committed."
_______
LESSON ONE * PART IV
PAUL'S GLIMPSE OF GLORY
II CORINTHIANS 11:22 - GALATIANS 1:7
Let's pick up here in Chapter 13, and I'm not going to take this last chapter
verse by verse, as you can read it at your leisure. However, I do want to close
the Book with the final verse which is verse 14. This verse is probably the
clearest statement concerning the Trinity that you can find anywhere in
Scripture, next to Christ's baptism. I know when someone writes wanting to know
where we get the idea of the Trinity (and if we can give them Scriptures for
it), that the two we use the most are this one and where Christ was baptized:
Matthew 3:16,17
"And Jesus, when he was baptized, went up straightway out of the water:
and, lo, the heavens were opened unto him, and he saw the Spirit of God
descending like a dove, and lighting upon him: 17. And lo a voice from heaven,
saying, `This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.'"
At His baptism you have all three persons of the Trinity there at one time. Now
here in this verse we have the apostle Paul making reference also to the three
Persons of the Godhead in a pure unadulterated statement. Now verse 14:
II Corinthians 13:14
"The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ, and the love of God, (The
Father is implied) and the communion of the Holy Ghost, be with you all.
Amen."
Now it's interesting that, normally when we speak of the Trinity, out of habit
we put them in the order of God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy
Spirit. But when you look at this verse, there is something different. Paul
changes the order of the three. Paul puts Christ first rather than the Father.
Not that there is any change in the way the Trinity operates. Never. You've all
heard me teach that there is no such thing as God the Father having power over
God the Son, and over the Spirit or vice versa. They are all three co-equal.
They are all three members of the Godhead. Let me take you, for a moment, to
the Book of Colossians where Paul makes that same statement.
Here is where the Jewish people in their Old Testament background refer to
Christianity as a polytheism. They call us a religion of three Gods. But we're
not three Gods, it's three Persons in one God. And of course the Old Testament
does not clarify that like it does in the New Testament.
Colossians 2:8,9
"Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after
the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.
9. For in him (that is in Christ) dwelleth all the fulness of the
Godhead bodily."
Now backing up a little bit to Colossians Chapter 1. And I think all of this
gives us a clear picture that the Godhead is that invisible Spirit out of which
God the Son stepped and became visible.
Colossians 1:15-19
"Who (speaking of God the Son and the redeeming Blood in verses
13 and 14) is the image of the invisible God, (the Godhead)
the first born of every creature: (in other words Christ was
pre-eternal in His existence just like God the Father, and God the Spirit.)
16. For by him (God the Son) were all things created, that
are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be
thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers; all things were created by
him, and for him; 17. And he is before all things, and by him all things
consist. (or held together. Remember now this is speaking of God the
Son) 18. And he is the head of the body, the church: who is the
beginning, the firstborn from the dead; (referring to His resurrection)
that in all things he might have the preminence. 19. For it pleased the
Father that in him (Christ) should all fulness dwell;"
So the members of the Godhead are not One above the other, but rather they are
all co-equal. Now returning to our text in II Corinthians. This is why, now,
that Paul in complete liberty, and again, under the inspiration of the Holy
Spirit, can sort of reverse the order that we normally use. Looking at verse 14
again:
II Corinthians 13:14
"The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ, and the love of God, and the
communion of the Holy Ghost, be with you all. Amen."
Well, that will more or less wrap up our study of the Corinthian letters, and
so we'll just turn the page and go right into the next one in the New Testament
order which is the Book of Galatians. Now I've put a caricature map on the
board and although it's not according to scale, I think most of you will
recognize what part of the world we're speaking of here. Some of you might
wonder. "Why don't you use a professional map?" Well the reason I stick to my
mundane simplistic way of doing things is that my whole thrust of teaching is
to get you to teach people like I do. I don't know the number of times I've had
people sit with us over the years at the kitchen table, and I get out a plain
piece of typewriter paper, and simply draw. I would hope that you folks would
be able also to just freehand some of these things - even if it's a caricature,
it's not perfect, it's something that you can recognize, then use. Always be
ready when people ask questions. Have your answers ready, and if you get a
chance to witness to someone in your home, get a piece of paper and just simply
as you know how, draw these things out.
Now that's what I've drawn up here on the board leading up to the Book of
Galatians. As you see, we have the Mediterranean Sea coast, and down here, of
course, would be the city of Jerusalem, the Jordan valley, the Sea of Galilee,
and the Dead Sea. Now as you turn the corner of the Mediterranean Sea, and go
under the underbelly of what is today Turkey, right down through the middle of
Turkey was what we called Galatia. The city to whom this letter of Galatians
was written. Now, at the western end of Turkey you had the ancient city of
Ephesus, to whom the letter of the Ephesians was written, and the churches in
that area. Then across the Aegean Sea up here was Philippi, and Thessalonica,
and Berea, and all the way down to Athens. And then across to Corinth, and
across the Adrian Sea was Italy and Rome.
Now as we study the Book of Galatians we're going to be dealing with Paul's
letter to these people in this very area where we covered his first missionary
journey. Antioch of Pisida, Lystra and Derbe. Remember Paul was stoned at
Lystra, and after they had spent some time over here at the eastern end of
Galatia, they retraced their steps and went back to Antioch. We will cover his
second missionary journey at a later time.
Now to this letter of Galatians which is only six chapters. I pointed out a few
programs ago that Paul was under such duress to get this letter written as
quickly as possible that he didn't even wait for some kind of secretary to take
dictation - but rather he laboriously printed it in large block letters because
of his poor eye sight. There was such an intense need to get this letter up to
those Galatian assemblies who were being bombarded by the Judaisers to come
under the Law of Moses. And the thought of this just exercised the apostle to
the point that he had to sit down and get this letter up to those congregations
before it would be too late.
You see this little letter is so appropriate today because we're
under the same kind of a bombardment. I had a letter today from someone who
said, "Les I'm finding that most people hate Paul's doctrines of Grace." Well
I've never put it quite that strongly, but I do know most people don't like
them. Because you see most people want to do something. They want to feel that
somehow they have merited favor with God. But you just remember that God will
have none of that. He says, "Either you believe that I've finished it or it
will profit you nothing!" But this runs contrary to human thought. So what
we're going to see now in these little six chapters of Galatians is this
constant warning by the apostle that you're not under Law, but rather Grace.
Don't let these people pervert the Gospel by adding something to it.
Now time-wise Galatians was written probably a couple of years before the
Corinthian letters. Remember the Books that Paul wrote are not in the order in
which he wrote them. But also remember they are in the exact order that the
Holy Spirit wanted them. Paul's letters have always been in this exact order as
we have them today. They are not in the chronological order that they were
written as Thessalonians was written first and then Galatians, Romans,
Corinthians, then the epistles of Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, then
First and Second Timothy and Titus. The whole theme of this letter is to
convince the Galatians and us that we are not under Law, we're under Grace.
Galatians 1:1
"Paul, an apostle, (not of men, neither by man, but by Jesus Christ, and
God the Father, who raised him from the dead;)"
Now, of what does Paul immediately remind his followers? The authority of his
apostleship. He always comes at that first, that he had the absolute authority
to proclaim the truth that he's proclaiming, and it had nothing to do with men
appointing him. It's interesting, that back in Acts Chapter 13 (when Paul and
Barnabas left to go on that 1st missionary journey), how careful the Scripture
was to point out that it wasn't the Church that sent them, but rather the Holy
Spirit.
Acts 13:2-4
"As they ministered to the Lord, and fasted, the Holy Ghost said,
`Separate me Barnabas and Saul for the work whereunto I have called them.' 3.
And when they had fasted and prayed, and laid their hands on them, they sent
them away. 4. So they, being sent forth by the Holy Ghost, departed unto
Seleucia, and from thence they sailed to Cyprus."
So the Holy Spirit sent them, not the Church at Antioch. And it's the same way
here. Paul makes it plain that he did not come into this role of apostleship
because maybe the Twelve ordained him, or some other group ordained him or
taught him or set him down. No way did that happen. He comes on the scene by
the miraculous laying of this apostleship on him by the Lord Jesus. Now verse
2:
Galatians 1:2
"And all the brethren which are with me, (that was his traveling
companions) unto the churches of Galatia: 3. Grace be to you and peace
from God the Father, and from our Lord Jesus Christ."
Now, in verse 4, right off the bat we find Paul bringing out the Gospel by
which we are saved. I mean the guy can't help it, as in his writing, it's
constantly going to come to the top.
Galatians 1:4,5
"Who (our Lord Jesus Christ of verse 3) gave himself for
our sins, that he might deliver us from this present evil world, according to
the will of God and our Father: 5. To whom be glory for ever and ever.
Amen."
Now that's the simplistic statement again of the Gospel (Ref. I Corinthians
15:1-4) How that Christ gave Himself. He wasn't forced, it was of His own
volition. In fact, turn ahead a few pages to the Book of Philippians.
Philippians 2:5-7
"Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus: 6. Who, being
in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with
God: (He was God!) 7. But made himself of no reputation,
and took upon him the form of a servant, (or a slave. He was nothing in
the eyes of a Roman world) and was made in the likeness of
men:..."
We've got to be careful here. In fact, the question came up recently regarding
where II Corinthians Chapter 5 says, "He became sin for us."
II Corinthians 5:21
"For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew not sin; that we might
be made the righteousness of God in him."
Well, Christ didn't become a sinner per se, but what did He do? He took the
sinners place. He became our substitute. After that conversation I had to start
thinking of other examples in the Scripture. For example when Abraham was going
to offer Isaac: just when he's ready to fulfill the command from God to offer
his son Isaac, what does God provide in the thicket? The ram. What did the ram
become? The substitute. The ram didn't become Isaac. Now the same way with
Christ. When He went to the Cross, He did not, as I see Scripture, become a
vile sinner, but rather He took on Himself all the sins of the human race
without becoming a sinner, and says, "Yet without sin." Now that's beyond our
human comprehension. But it was His substitutionary work, that where you and I
should have died, He took our place. He didn't become Les Feldick, He didn't
become Kenneth, David, Rosalee or anybody else, but merely became our
substitute. And this is what Paul is referring to here. Now verse 8:
Philippians 2:8
"And being found in fashion (form) as a man,
(totally man, but also totally God) he humbled himself, and
became obedient unto death, (the most horrible death ever
devised) even the death of the cross."
Now that is what becomes, then, the very bedrock of our salvation. We believe
that. That's it, and yet it's so simple that people stumble over it. But on the
other hand, as I've said so often, it is so complex. I could live to be a
thousand years old and never comprehend it. It's impossible for us as humans to
comprehend the power of the work of the Cross. It is beyond us, but on the
other hand it's so simple that all God asks us to do is "Believe it!" And the
world refuses to do so. Now back to Galatians Chapter 1 and let's look at verse
4 again.
Galatians 1:4a
"Who gave himself for our sins, that he might deliver us (He's
the one that is delivering us from) this present evil
world,..."
Remember in our last program I was making reference to the wickedness that was
in place in the Roman Empire. Just beyond our comprehension. I think you're all
aware that historians have bemoaned the fact that America is going down the
same road that Rome went. Just as sure as Rome rotted from within so we
Americans are doing the same thing. The more I read of Roman history the more I
know what they're talking about. Do you know that Rome was almost totally given
over to the welfare system. The only people who worked were the captive of
their military excursions, and they just used them as slaves. The Roman
citizens did nothing; and in order to satisfy all their leisure hours they had
to concoct something to keep them satisfied, and that gave rise to the
coliseum, and the lions, feeding of the Christians, the gladiators, and all the
rest. It also then gave rise to their implacable immorality, it was beyond
description. Now reading on into verse 6, and here we find Paul getting to the
heart of the matter of why he is writing this letter. Remember he's gotten word
that these Galatian believers are being besieged by the Judaisers who want to
bring them back under the Law of Moses. Practice circumcision, practice Temple
worship or whatever was applicable. So Paul says:
Galatians 1:6
"I marvel (I can't comprehend) that ye are so soon removed
from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel:"
Paul couldn't comprehend how these people, as we saw in Thessalonians in the
last program, turned from idols to the living God, and now they're not
satisfied with just Grace, now they're being hoodwinked to go under legalism.
Paul tells them that they are moving from the Grace of Christ into another
gospel. But what does the next verse say?
Galatians 1:7
"Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would
pervert the gospel of Christ."
Oh it's not really another gospel, it's not something totally different, but
it's a perversion. Now what is a perversion? Something that has been fooled
with. It is no longer pure, so this is what has happened here. They hadn't just
turned their back on Christianity as we call it, they hadn't turned their back
on Christ, but they had turned their back on Paul's Gospel of pure Grace
that Jesus died for our sins, was buried, and rose again and believing that
plus nothing for salvation. They were now believing these Judaisers that,
yes, maybe they did have to practice the Law. So they are now bending in that
direction and this is the purpose of the letter. You're not under Law, you're
under Grace, and even today this is the heart cry. "Why can't people see that
we're not under anything legalistic, we're under Grace!" And Grace is simply
the fact that there is nothing that you and I can do to merit favor with God.
The only thing that we can do is BELIEVE!
_______
LESSON TWO * PART I
PERVERTED GOSPEL
GALATIANS 1:1 - 1:14
Now always remember as we start our lesson today that we are just an informal
Bible study. We don't try to twist people's arms or move them from one group to
another. All we ask is that you get into the Book and learn to read and study
it. If you really get a love for the Word, then reading the Bible is not
enough, you are going to end up studying it. But if you really want to get what
you need out of it you must study, and that's what the Scripture says:
II Timothy 2:15
"Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to
be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth."
Know what is Law and what is Grace, and don't mix the two, and the only way you
will ever be able to do that is study. So we like folks to know that all
we're trying to do is emphasize the study of God's Word. We just have a heart
for people to be taught from the Word and to be taught how the Word is divided,
and we don't mean the Old from the New Testament. Once you learn how to divide
the Word the whole Bible will just open up to you.
Now instead of going right on into Galatians, I would like to review our
timeline for a moment. We just get so many requests and comments about our
timeline. I've had so many people tell me that, "If you've ever done anything
to open up the Bible, it's using the timeline." So in response to those
requests I just thought that we would digress for this lesson and review once
again the timeline and how everything unfolds and how it all fits and how
everything rests on that which has gone before. So, consequently, it is hard
to understand the Church Age and why God is dealing with us the way He is
unless we see where it all begin.
I'll never forget years ago, and I've used this story over and over in our
Oklahoma classes, but it's so appropriate. It's the story of the Gentlemen who
came to our ranch one night. I had been bailing hay all day and I was tired,
and it was about 10:30 at night, and he introduced himself, and said, "Tell
me, Who in the world is Jesus Christ?" Now at the time it shook me up. I
thought how in the world could anybody ask a question like that? But now some
five or six years later all I ask is, "Why don't more people ask that very
question?" Because most people don't know Who He is. Oh, they know He was
born at Bethlehem, and they know He went through a crucifixion, but to really
know Who Christ is and how He came on the scene - many people haven't got a
clue. Well, that night we went into our kitchen, to that old round oak table
where we have led many people to the Lord. We put on a pot of coffee and that's
what I did with him, I drew the timeline.
And if you want to get someone interested in the Word of God, learn to use the
timeline. It's quite simple to use. Now I'm going to complicate it a little bit
today by showing the difference between what the disciples and early Jewish
believers understood compared to what you and I now understand as Church Age
believers. Because God interrupted His original program for the Nation of
Israel, and turned to the Gentiles instead.
So as far as the Scriptures are concerned, let's begin with the Abrahamic
Covenant in Genesis Chapter 12. From the timeline you will see that, if Adam
was created at 4004 BC (and most chronologers pretty much agree on that), then
from Adam to the call of Abraham or Abram as he was first known in Genesis 12,
covers 2000 years. Now I don't put a lot of emphasis on that in this particular
lesson because eleven chapters of Genesis covers that whole 2000 year span. So
come over to Genesis 12, and here we will read for a moment. Here we have that
Covenant that God made with Abram out of Ur of the Chaldees, so Abram was a
Syrian, although God used him to begin the Jewish race. Anyway God made a
special Covenant with him and here it is beginning with verse 1.
Genesis 12:1
"Now the LORD had said (back in Chapter 11) unto Abram,
`Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred, and from thy father's
house, unto a land that I will (future) shew thee: 2. And I will
make of thee a great nation, and I will bless thee, and make thy name great;
and thou shalt be a blessing 3. And I will bless them that bless thee, and
curse him that curseth thee; and in thee (through a lineage of people
that would come from this man) shall all families of the earth be
blessed.'"
This Abrahamic Covenant is given to the man who would be the father of a race
of people who had never been on the earth before. They came out of Adam, and
Noah and the three sons, but God institutes now by His Sovereignty a new race
or nation of people that we have come to know as Israel. So the Jews came as a
result of this Covenant made with this one man. This Covenant promises a nation
of people, and implied is that you can't have a nation of people functioning
and operating unless they are in their own geographical area, a homeland. And
it's also implied that if you have a nation of people and they are in a
geographical area, you can not have law and order and an economy unless you
have a government.
So those are the three main tenants of the Abrahamic. That God will make of
this one man a nation of people, put them in their own geographical area of
land, and then at some future day, He and the person of God in the flesh would
be their King. And that is the promise of the Messiah, and the redeemer. Now
with the 2000 BC call of Abraham we have God dealing for the next 2000 years up
to Christ's first advent with Jew only, and, of course, there are always a few
exceptions. I have called this whole period of time from Abraham until we get
out here to the Church Age, when the Jewish program is interrupted, the period
of prophecy, the prophetic program, or the Old Testament program, and we'll see
how it was interrupted. But when I say that it is a program of prophecy, I want
you to turn the page here in Genesis to Chapter 15. I always like to make these
things as plain as I possibly can. True prophecy is telling the future, as we
understand in the Old Testament, and is almost always when God made a promise,
He put it in a time frame. Now that's how explicit God is when He tells the
future. God will name the day, and He will name the number of years that will
be involved in that particular process. Now, here in Genesis 15, Abraham has
now come along and he's going to have children. The first one, Ishmael, was not
according to God's plan, but nevertheless in Genesis 15 here we have what I
call a real example of true prophecy. Look at verse 13.
Genesis 15:13
"And he (God) said unto Abram, `Know of a surety
(it's going to happen) that thy seed (your offspring through
Isaac) shall be a stranger in a land that is not theirs, (they
are going to be some place other than the promised land, and we know it was
Egypt) and shall serve them; (they are going to go into bondage,
and now here comes the time element) and they shall afflict them four
hundred years:'"
Do you see that? Now God is making a prophecy that this nation coming out of
this one man, Abraham, will end up in a nation that is not theirs which we know
is Egypt, and it's going to cover a period of 400 years. Now that's the way
prophecy always works. Now according to my timeline, once we come past the
first 11 chapters which is Adam, and the flood, and the tower of Babel - now
comes the call of Abraham and the appearance of the Nation of Israel. Then we
come 500 years to Moses and the Exodus experience, and the Law. Then we have
all the rest of the Old Testament writers in the prophets, the Psalms and
everything else. So everything now is prophetically looking forward to, and
promising what we call, the first advent of Christ. In other words, His birth
at Bethlehem when He came to the Nation of Israel to fulfill those promises.
Now what I always refer to as the outline of this prophetic or Old Testament
program is Psalms Chapter 2. Now a lot of this is repetition even for a lot of
our television viewers, but on the other hand we have a lot of new people every
week. So here in Psalms Chapter 2 I call this the outline of God's prophetic
program.
Psalms 2:1-6
"Why do the heathen (in Old Testament language, and even in the
New Testament anyone that was not a Jew born out of Isaac, and Jacob, and the
Twelve sons was either called a Gentile, or heathen, or uncircumcised. So why
does the heathen the non[-Jews) rage, and the people (the
promised Covenant people Israel) imagine a vain thing?
2. The kings of the earth set themselves, and the
rulers (of Israel) take counsel together, (even though
the Book of Acts lays the blame on the Nation of Israel for crucifying Christ,
yet never forget Rome carried it out) against the LORD, and against his
anointed, saying, 3. `Let us break their bands asunder, (that is the
Godhead. Let's not let God rule in our affairs) and cast away their
cords (God's Sovereign rule) from us.' (Now here was the
response of God the Father in Heaven) 4. He that sitteth in the heavens
shall laugh: the LORD shall have them (the nations of the world and
Israel) in derision. 5. Then (now that's not a
specific time of six months or years, but nevertheless there would be a
definite time element between His crucifixion, and the next event in the
timeline and that is not a pretty picture. And what is it? His wrath! The wrath
of God, and) shall he speak unto them in his wrath, and vex them in his
sore displeasure. (the nations of the world and Israel in particular.
Now that's the Tribulation) 6. Yet have I set my king upon my holy hill
of Zion." Now in verse 6 that's the 1000-year Kingdom age that is
coming.
Now then coming back to the timeline, we have Abraham at 2000 BC all the way up
to Christ's first advent it was all Jew, with a few exceptions, and God dealing
with only the Nation of Israel. Christ came and brought about His three years
of earthly ministry, preaching and proclaiming Who He was only to the Nation of
Israel, (Matthew 15:24) and they crucified Him. He ascended back to glory, and
now, according to Psalms 2 that we just looked at, the next event would be the
wrath and vexation which would be the seven years of Tribulation and then
Christ would come and yet set up His Kingdom. Now that's Psalms Chapter 2,
verses 5, 6, and 7. That's just as plain as you can get.
It's obvious then, there's something missing in those verses: what is it? The
Church Age. There is not a word about the Church Age in the Old Testament.
There's not a word about the Church Age in the Four Gospels that God would turn
to the non-Jew, the Gentiles, and call out of them the Body of Christ of Jews
and Gentiles. The only thing that the Old Testament was looking for was the
fulfillment of this line of promises. That Christ would come, He would suffer,
He would die. He'd be raised from the dead and then the wrath of God would
fall, and then the Kingdom would be set up. Now let me show you how obvious it
really is that Peter had no concept of anything other than this Old Testament
timeline - Acts Chapter 2 on the day of Pentecost. Remember these Jewish
believers had been accused of starting their drinking a little too early in the
morning. So by 9 a.m. they were drunk. Well I don't know how in the world they
could accuse someone who was speaking in languages that everybody could
understand of being drunk. My experience with drunken people is you can't
understand one language let alone many. Now in verse 15, Peter's response
was:
Acts 2:15-18
"For these are not drunken, as ye suppose, seeing it is but the third
hour of the day. (only 9 o'clock in the morning. But Peter in verse 16
is saying in effect that what you're seeing is fulfillment of prophecy)
16. But this is that which was spoken by the prophet Joel; (now
where's Joel? Back in the Old Testament, it was part of prophecy, and now he
quotes him. This is what Joel wrote) 17. And it shall come to pass in the
last days saith God, I will pour out of my Spirit upon all flesh: and your sons
and your daughters shall prophesy, and your young men shall see visions, and
your old men shall dream dreams: 18. And on my servants and on my handmaidens I
will pour out in those days of my Spirit; and they shall
prophesy:..."
Peter was seeing this happen on the day of Pentecost. Now if Peter had
understood that there was going to be a Church Age and that Israel was going to
go into a dispersion, he should have stopped right here, and not read the
rest. Because the rest is Tribulation ground. But Peter didn't stop,
because he was still hanging on that Old Testament program that Israel had to
come to a knowledge of their Messiah and then the Tribulation could unfold, and
then they would have the King and the Kingdom. But since he didn't understand
this, look what he continues to quote in verse 19.
Acts 2:19-21
"And I will shew wonders in heaven above, and signs in the earth beneath;
blood, and fire, and vapour of smoke; 20. The sun shall be turned into
darkness, and the moon into blood, before that great and notable day of the
Lord come: (that's the Tribulation, and Peter knew that it had to come)
21. And it shall come to pass, that whosoever shall call on the name of
the Lord shall be saved."
Now that's not Paul, as he writes in Romans 10:9-13, but rather this is Peter.
Peter is still in the prophetic program and all he's talking about here is that
the One you crucified has been raised from the dead. He's gone back to glory
according to Psalms 110:1, and He's sitting at the Fathers right hand; and yet
would come the wrath and vexation, and then Christ would return at His second
coming, and yet set up His Kingdom. But Israel rejected it so the King couldn't
pour out the Tribulation wrath, He had to wait in heaven until something
else glorious would come to pass.
And now we must turn a little farther in Acts to Chapter 9. Now this is just a
quick review. But here in Chapter 9 I want you to jump all the way to verse 15.
And here we are at Saul's tremendous conversion on the road to Damascus. This
one who detested (hated with a passion) the name of Jesus of Nazareth because
he could see it as just totally rotting away Judaism. It was defaming the
Temple and the Law, and so he did everything humanly possible to stamp out the
name of Jesus of Nazareth. So Saul thinks he's got everything pretty much under
control in his homeland of Jerusalem and Judea and so now he has gone to the
high priest and has gotten permission to even go to Damascus.
Remember, the high priest and the leaders of Judaism had a fair amount of clout
even with the Roman government; that they could actually demand extradition
from certain cities from the Romans like we do today with certain countries.
And so Saul rehearses in Acts Chapter 26 what they would do with these who had
believed in Jesus of Nazareth. They would take them back to Jerusalem, throw
them in prison, and put them to death. Now as Saul of Tarsus has met the Lord
on the road to Damascus (and you all know the account here is where you have
that tremendous change in the modus operandi of the Sovereign God), look at
verse 15.
Acts 9:15,16
"But the Lord said unto him, (Ananias) `Go thy way: for he
(Saul, later to be named Paul) is a chosen vessel unto me, to
bear my name before the Gentiles, and kings, and the children of Israel: 16.
For I will shew him how great things he must suffer for my name's
sake.'"
Now that opens the door to the apostle Paul's ministry among the Gentiles. Now,
on the timeline, this is where we are concerned with. Prophecy had run its
course with the exception of the seven years of Tribulation and the 1000 years
reign of Christ in the Kingdom age. Christ had come according to prophecy. He
was rejected, He was crucified; but now all of a sudden with Israel's continued
rejection, the prophetic program of Jew-only has come to a screeching halt, and
God's time clock stopped, and prophecy stopped. God then opened something
completely new in Scripture. And what is it? The mysteries. Paul is always
saying, "Behold I show you a mystery" Let's look at it in Romans
Chapter 16:25:
Romans 16:25
"Now to him that is of power to stablish you according to my
gospel, (as found in I Corinthians 15:1-4. Not the gospel of the
Kingdom that Jesus and the Twelve preached, but Paul's Gospel that was revealed
only to him) and the preaching of Jesus Christ, according to the
revelation of the mystery, which was kept secret since the world
begin,"
So now for almost 2000 years, we haven't been in the prophetic program. We are
in the Age of Grace which is the revelation of the mysteries. Things that were
kept secret back here in the Old Testament - there was no concept of Gentiles
being brought into a relationship with the Almighty God. But when the Church is
complete and it can be taken out of the way in what we call the Rapture then
you see on our timeline the parentheses around the Church on the timeline is
removed and the timeline is just like it was originally.
Then the prophetic program will go right on and yet be completed. Now all you
have to do is look at the situation. Israel is back in the land like she was at
the time of Christ's first coming. They'll soon have their Temple, and they
will go back under Judaism, and the Law and Temple worship. The revived Roman
empire is already on the scene. The European community is just about complete,
and so everything is now falling into place. It will be just like it was at the
time of Christ's first advent. Oh, granted, technology has exploded, but yet it
is all for the sole purpose of bringing about the end-time scenario for that
second coming of Christ to the Nation of Israel.
_______
LESSON TWO * PART II
PERVERTED GOSPEL
GALATIANS 1:1 - 1:14
Now in our last lesson we went over the timeline. It is so self-explanatory how
everything just unfolded and fell into place. The thing we have to
understand is that the Church Age was never revealed until the apostle Paul
came on the scene. So consequently, there is nothing of the Church in
the Old Testament or the Four Gospels, and we have to realize that,
doctrinally, the Church today has to go to the letters of Paul for its faith
and practice. And when you do that it just solves a multitude of problems
and confusion, because there are many people who think the Bible is
contradictory. But when you show the difference between Law and Grace, between
Israel and the Church Age, then that settles it all. It's not contradictory,
but rather a different method of operation. Naturally, Law was a whole
different program, and it was a works religion, but Grace is all of Grace. We
will see this now as we get into Paul's letter to the Galatians. Remember the
Holy Spirit was in total control of all this man accomplished.
Remember, Paul was under constant attack wherever he went about his
apostleship. This was done primarily by the Judaisers, when they would say that
he was an impostor. The Judaisers claimed he had turned his back and was a
turncoat against the traditions of the fathers of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.
They even went so far as to claim that he didn't have the authority that Peter
had because he didn't walk with Christ like Peter did. So Paul was under that
constant attack for both reasons. Even when we come into the Book of Galatians,
the first thing he's going to declare is his apostleship. He was an apostle,
not declared by any group of men, but by God Himself. In fact let's look at how
this bothered Paul, that he was under this constant attack. Let's look at it
for a moment in II Corinthians Chapter 11. And remember this is Holy Spirit
inspired. This is just Paul writing from his own spirit, this is the inspired
Word of God.
II Corinthians 11:5
"For I suppose I was not a whit behind the very chiefest
apostles."
Well who was the chiefest apostle? Peter was. And he's not letting Peter have
an advantage on him. Now skip down to verse 22.
II Corinthians 11:22a
"Are they Hebrews?..."
Well, who do you suppose he's talking about here? I think he's
talking about the Twelve in Jerusalem whom his Gentile people are being told by
Judaisers, "This guy Paul wasn't ever with Peter, this guy never spent three
years with Jesus. So how can you listen to him?" Looking at verse 22 again.
II Corinthians 11:22,23
"Are they Hebrews? so am I, Are they Israelites? so am I. Are they the
seed of Abraham? so am I. 23. Are they ministers of Christ? (I speak as a
fool) (he knows he may sound a little braggadocios, but remember he's
inspired by the Holy Spirit to write. He says) I am more; (do you
see that? This apostle says he was more than those back there at Jerusalem.
More) in labours more abundant, in stripes above measure, in prisons more
frequent, in deaths oft."
Then he goes on to show how he suffered for the sake of the Gospel, the likes
of which Peter, James and John never did. Now coming on into Chapter 12 and,
for emphasis, the Holy Spirit has Paul repeat this for the third time in just a
few verses. So this is very important to the Spirit of God.
II Corinthians 12:11
"I am become a fool in glorying; (Paul didn't like to bring up
his own credentials, but he had to defend himself because they were trying to
put him down as no account.) ye have compelled me: for I ought to have
been commended of you: for in nothing am I behind the very chiefest apostles,
though I be nothing."
Paul knew he was nothing. He never took any of the credit, but he has to
constantly affirm his apostleship, and even in this day and age we have to
defend him even as much as when he was writing. I've stressed it on this
program over and over, how many theologians, pastors, and preachers, and
ministers totally ignore this man's writings? His writings are almost treated
like a plague. And yet this is where we get our doctrines of salvation, this is
where we have to be if we're going to know the truth of God during this age of
Grace. Now for the Book of Galatians.
Remember Galatia was that central part of what is now the country of Turkey. It
was probably in the southern half of Galatia where Paul had his first bad
experience on his first missionary journey as he visited these cities of
Antioch, Persidia, Listra and Derbe. Remember, Listra is also where he was
stoned and left for dead. But here he writes to this group of little Churches
that no doubt he had planted. And now they were being bombarded by these
Judaisers. They were the Jewish element from Jerusalem. Whether it was the
Orthodox who still rejected Jesus of Nazareth as their Messiah, or whether it
was the Judaisers who had embraced Christ I don't know. Either way it doesn't
make much difference.
They both were so hung up on the fact that you had to be circumcised and keep
the Law of Moses or you couldn't be saved. So these Judaisers were coming into
these little congregations that Paul had been able to plant through his sweat,
blood, and tears and they're telling them, "You can't be saved by Paul's
message alone (which was "By believing in your heart that Jesus died for
you, was buried and rose again."). These Judaisers were saying "You
can't be saved like he says, but rather you must be circumcised, and keep the
Law." They just couldn't get it out of their craw. Let me show you what I'm
talking about. We're going to see it again in Galatians Chapter 2, but we won't
be able to get there in this series of lessons. Come back with me to Acts
Chapter 15.
I don't think there are too many Church people who know these verses are
even in their Bible. These verses say it so clearly that I don't even have
to explain the verses. Remember now this is about 52 AD and some 12 years after
Peter went to Cornelius' house. It's about 22 years after the Cross. This is 15
years after Paul's saving experience on the road to Damascus, so time has been
rolling on. Now look what the Scriptures says.
Acts 15:1
"And certain men which came down from Judaea (that's Jerusalem)
taught the brethren, and said, (see they somehow wiggled their
way into Paul's converts who had recently came out of paganism. But these
Judaisers said) `Except ye be circumcised after the manner of Moses, ye
cannot be saved.'" Do you see how plain that is? Now jump over to verse
5 in this same chapter.
Acts 15:5
"But there rose up certain of the sect of the Pharisees which
believed, (now these were people who had believed like the Twelve that
Jesus was the Messiah.) saying, `That it was needful to circumcise them,
and to command them to keep the law of Moses.'"
Now these people were trying to pervert Paul's Gospel. And they didn't just
suggest that they keep the Law of Moses, they commanded them to do it. And when
they commanded it they were attaching the keeping of the Law to Paul's Gospel.
Now that's what your Bible says. I don't care what translation that you have
they can't foul it up that much. I know some of the translators do a pretty
good job of fouling up the Word of God. Now then back to the Book of
Galatians.
Here the apostle Paul is probably back at Corinth if I'm not mistaken. Now at
this writing it's about 60 AD, so it's been about 20 years since he began his
ministry to the Gentiles. He is now getting word that his little congregations
up there in Galatia are being bombarded to go under the Law of Moses. So this
little Book is written to correct this false teaching and bring them back under
the pure Grace of God. Now listen, it's just as appropriate for the world today
as it was then. I'm even speaking of the world of Church people. Now verse 1,
and I know we looked at a few of these verses in our last taping so we'll just
skim over them.
Galatians 1:1,2
"Paul, an apostle, not of men, neither by man, (in other words
the Antioch Church didn't commission him an apostle) but by Jesus Christ,
and God the Father, who raised him from the dead;) 2. And all the brethren
which are with me, unto the churches of Galatia:"
Now the brethren that were with Paul would probably include Luke, and Silias,
and maybe Timothy. Now verse 3:
Galatians 1:3
"Grace be to you and peace from God the Father, and from our Lord Jesus
Christ,"
Now I've got to make a point about something up there in verse 2. Because they
had given in to false teaching, we find Paul leaves an important part out of
his address to the Galatian Church. Now you probably won't catch it unless I
tell you. Look at the verse again.
Galatians 1:2
"And all the brethren which are with me, unto the churches of
Galatia:"
Let me show you. A good example is found in the Book of Romans Chapter 1:7.
Let's compare Scripture with Scripture. That's the only way you learn some of
these things. And it's a subtle way of telling us how far these Galatians had
already degenerated because of the perverted Gospel.
Romans 1:7a
"To all that be in Rome, beloved of God, called to be
saints:..."
Do you see that? Now that's quite a commendation isn't it? He is commending the
Romans for that kind of a position. Now let's look at the Corinthians. I'm
pretty sure that it's in there also.
I Corinthians 1:2
"Unto the church of God which is at Corinth, to them that are sanctified
in Christ Jesus, called to be saints, with all that in every place call upon
the name of Jesus Christ our Lord,..." Now I don't know whether II
Corinthians does it or not. Let's look and see.
II Corinthians 1:1
"Paul, an apostle of Jesus Christ by the will of God, and Timothy our
brother, unto the church of God which is at Corinth, with all the saints which
are in all Achaia:"
Even the Corinthian Church. Remember when we studied Corinthians, what kind of
a church were they? Carnal. Now let's look at the Book of Ephesians and that
will be far enough because I think I've made my point.
Ephesians1:1
"Paul, an apostle of Jesus Christ by the will of God, to the saints which
are at Ephesus, and to the faithful in Christ Jesus:"
Do you see that? All right now come back and look at the Galatian letter
again.
Galatians 1:2
"And all the brethren which are with me, unto the churches of
Galatia:"
Isn't that something? There is nothing about them being saints of any kind.
They now have become just "the churches of Galatia." You know when I first
started seeing this some time ago it reminded me of God's attitude toward the
Nation of Israel back when He was writing to Daniel. Often He would refer to
the Nation of Israel as "Thy people." God didn't call them "My People." Why?
Because they had degenerated so far from their love of Jehovah that God wasn't
really even claiming them. They were Daniel's people, they were Moses' people,
but He didn't say "My People" like He did at the beginning. At the beginning He
called them "My People" and He will again when Israel finally responds at His
second coming. Let's look at it in Jeremiah Chapter 31 and verse 33. Some day
I'm going to get into trouble trying to do this from memory. This is the point
that I want you to see with regard to the new Covenant.
Jeremiah 31:33
"But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of
Israel; After those days, saith the Lord, `I will put my law in their inward
parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall
be (what?) my people.'"
Now they're not tonight. God doesn't call Israel "my people" tonight because
they're far from Him. Oh, they may be religious, but they're not God's people
per se, but the day is coming when they will be. Oh, listen God is not through
with that nation. Don't you believe all of this garbage that He has completely
forgotten His Covenant promises, and that's all it is. God is going to yet
complete His prophetic program because prophecy cannot stop in mid-place. Now
coming back quickly to the Book of Galatians. Now here in verse 4 comes Paul's
major message throughout all his letters.
Galatians 1:4,5
"Who gave himself for our sins, that he might deliver us from this
present evil world, according to the will of God and our Father: 5. To whom be
glory for ever and ever. Amen."
Now here we come to the crux of this letter. You know what it means to correct
someone? For example, we might have a rocket headed out into outer space, and
for some reason or another it gets off track a little bit, what do they have to
do? Well, they've got to get busy with their computers and bring it back on
track or else it's a disaster. Well, it's the same way here. The Galatians were
off course, and the whole purpose of this little sixth chapter of the Book of
Galatians is to correct and bring them back on course to the knowledge of
truth, and get them away form the false teachings that were besieging them.
Galatians 1:6
"I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the
grace of Christ unto another gospel:"
And yet he goes on to say in the next verse it's not really another, it's not
really a totally different one, but it's the same Gospel that he had used in
establishing them, but now it was being perverted, and polluted. Let's go for a
moment to the Book of II Corinthians Chapter 2, and this will be a good place
to compare Scripture with Scripture again.
II Corinthians 2:17
"For we are not as many, which corrupt the word of God: but as of
sincerity, but as of God, in the sight of God speak we in Christ."
Now you remember when we were studying this I took you back to the Book of
Isaiah Chapter 1:22 because it explains it so graphically, and it's in such
simple language. Kids can understand this. And you see the Jews understood all
this. This was part of their everyday experience, and this is exactly what Paul
was referring to when he said, "He didn't do this with spiritual commission."
Isaiah 1:22
"Thy silver is become dross, thy wine mixed with water:"
Now I'm not a buff on wine, but I can imagine that if you have an expensive
French wine, and you water it down with water, what do you have? Well you've
got something that isn't worth trying to swallow. What was the illusion? That
somebody was corrupting them. And that's exactly what Paul is talking about
back here in Galatians. Now come back with me to that Book. So in verse 7, Paul
says, "You're not falling for a totally different Gospel," but there are
some that would corrupt, or pollute (or like mixing water with wine, that's
what these Judaisers are doing with Paul's Gospel). Why? Because Paul's Gospel
says, "You are saved by Faith + NOTHING! And yet these Judaisers are
coming in and saying, "You can't be saved that way. Yes you can believe what
Paul tells you, but you have to also practice circumcision, and you have to
keep the Law of Moses. If you fail to do this then you can't be saved." Now
folks that's a pollution. That's a corruption of the truth, and that is why
Paul had to write this letter to the Galatians to correct them from this error
of believing something that wasn't correct because it was perverted.
_______
LESSON TWO * PART III
PERVERTED GOSPEL
GALATIANS 1:1 - 1:14
Now in our last lesson we stopped at verse 7, so that's where we will pick up
our text. When you study your Bible get a good concordance and start chasing
these themes down from cover to cover. Because the amazing thing of this Book
is that it all fits so beautifully. Now there are a lot of people who think the
Bible contradicts in places, but it doesn't contradict at all. It's just the
vast difference between Law and Grace. A good example of the difference
between Law and Grace is found in why we should forgive others. Jesus, during
His earthly ministry, speaking to the Nation of Israel, the Jews under the
Law said:
Matthew 6:14,15
"For if ye forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also
forgive you: 15. But if ye forgive not men their trespasses, neither will your
Father forgive your trespasses." Now the Holy Spirit revealed to the
apostle Paul under Grace why we should forgive:
Ephesians 4:32
"And be ye kind one to another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another,
even as God for Christ's sake hath (already) forgiven
you."
So #1: the key to understanding the Scriptures is to whom the particular text
is written to. It's high time that we get a fresh view of this again, because
you want to remember that when God called Moses up into Mount Sinai there in
Exodus, God gave the Law to Moses and Moses took it down the mountain and gave
it to the Nation of Israel. So Israel came under the Law. Not the rest of
the world, just Israel.
But, as Romans 3 says, all the world came under the condemnation power of the
Law and proved that no one is righteous, no not one. But so far as the mode of
operation of the Law was only given to the Nation of Israel, then as we're
going to see as we get into Galatians and Paul's account of his apostleship, we
find that Paul is the central character and to that man was revealed these
doctrines not of Law, but of Grace. And Grace is for primarily the
Gentiles, but it also includes the Jew. A Jew today can be saved under Grace as
well as a Gentile. But it is primarily God's time of calling out Gentiles from
among the unbelieving world. Now then, Paul's message, as we saw in our study
of the first two letters to the Corinthians, was to the pagan world. Paul could
come into these abject pagan people with nothing but the Gospel of the Grace of
God and they would come out of their paganism and become believers (or as we
normally like to use the term "Christians," although that word has certainly
lost its real meaning). Today almost anybody, and anything can be called a
Christian. So now let's begin in verse 7.
Galatians 1:7
"Which is not another; (Gospel) but there be some that
trouble you and would pervert the gospel of Christ."
Now when we talk about the Gospel of Christ we have to go back to where it is
the most explicitly laid out. Remember the Gospel for the Body of Christ was
only revealed to Paul so we need to turn to I Corinthians Chapter 15, and look
at those first four verses. This is the clearest explanation of Paul's Gospel
that you can find anywhere. Now he will refer to it as the Gospel of the Grace
of God, the Gospel of God, my Gospel, the Gospel according to the revelation of
the mysteries, but regardless how he refers to it, it's this Gospel.
I Corinthians 15:1-4
"Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel (not
a Gospel, not a perverted Gospel, not a corrupt Gospel, but
the Gospel) which I preached unto you, which also ye have
received, (remember Paul even addressed the carnal believer at Corinth
as saints.) and wherein ye stand; 2. By which also ye are saved, if ye
keep in memory what I preached unto you, (not what Peter and the Twelve
in Jerusalem have, but what I've preached) unless ye have believed in
vain. 3. For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also
received, (and we're going to see how he received it in Galatians in
just a moment. Now here comes the Gospel we must believe in our heart for
salvation.) how that Christ died for our sins according to the
scriptures; 4. And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day
according to the scriptures:
Long before the world or the universe was ever created, God already had the
whole scheme of things laid out. He wasn't caught by surprise. The whole human
experience was pre-planned, and the plan of redemption was already in place
long before Adam was ever created. And here it is, how that Christ died, was
buried, and rose again, according to the Scriptures. It was prophesied and now
all mankind has to do for salvation is to believe it, and we're going to see
that so clearly as we move on through this little letter to the Galatians. Now
come back to Galatians Chapter 1, verse 8. Oh the horrors that are going to
befall people who are guilty of what Paul is talking about in verse 8. I
shudder to think of what one day they are going to have to experience, because
look what he says here.
Galatians 1:8
"But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you
than that which we have preached unto you, (and I just showed you that
Gospel which was, that Christ died for you, was buried, and rose again, and if
they preach any other than that unto you for salvation) let him be
accursed."
Now that's a horribly strong word. Paul, speaking through the Holy Spirit, is
not just talking about maybe ending up 15 or 20 years in prison, he's not
talking about capital punishment. Paul is talking about an eternal separation
from God, an eternal doom to these people who are corrupting and are perverting
the pure Gospel of Grace. Hey that's enough to scare anybody. Now verse 9. And
again whenever you see the Scripture, whether it's Paul or Moses or the
prophets or wherever, if it repeats something you take special note. It's there
for the purpose of getting our attention. So here this warning is again in
verses 8 and 9.
Galatians 1:9
"As we said before, so say I now again, `If any man preach any other
gospel unto you than that ye have received, (from the lips of this
apostle) let him be accursed.'"
Now Paul wasn't talking there out of meanness, or out of envy of some other
minister. He was writing by inspiration of the Spirit, and the Spirit is making
the emphasis that if we adulterate and if we pervert the true Gospel, then we
are in danger of being accursed. Now you know apostasy is a terrible thing.
Most people don't even know what apostasy means. What is apostasy? Is that
something that the apostles taught? No, it has nothing to do with the apostles.
Apostasy is turning the back on the revealed truth of Scripture.
Someone sent me a little booklet by the old radio pastor, J. Vernon McGee who
has now gone on to be with the Lord. And the little booklet was copyrighted I
think in 1971. In this booklet he was rehearsing a conversation that he and the
president of Moody Bible Institute at that time had had. They were in a Bible
conference out in Los Angeles, and during that week of Bible conference he and
the president of Moody, and a couple of more well-known theologians were
visiting with each other, and the president of Moody made this statement. Now
remember the time element (1971) That man made the statement that he could
never envision the apostasy of the Church at that time. He had no idea that
the Church would be into such apostasy short of being in the Tribulation. Now
that's only been 27 years ago. What would the man think today? I don't think
they could handle it. But you see we've been programmed to see all this
creeping in and we just sort of roll with it. We accommodate, but listen we are
in such a state of apostasy that it's alarming. And why can't people see what
these verses say. They're under the condemnation of being accursed for
perverting the Gospel. Now move on to verse 10.
Galatians 1:10
"For do I now persuade men, or God? (who is Paul serving? Well
it's certainly not men, because like me, he didn't draw a salary. Paul didn't
have to be beholden to anybody. If he needed some money, he went out and sewed
some tents didn't he. So Paul didn't have to worry about losing his pay, so he
didn't have to serve men.) or do I seek to please men? for if I yet
pleased men, I should not be the servant of Christ."
Now that's quite a statement isn't it? Hey, you can't serve both, you cannot
please God and man. But listen, this apostle says that there is no way that I
am out here suffering imprisonment, suffering beatings, suffering shipwrecks,
suffering cold, and heat, and nakedness - all the things we studied back there
in II Corinthians Chapter 11. He says I didn't do that just to be serving men.
But Paul did that because he was the bond slave of Jesus Christ. Now that
reminds me of a verse in the Book of Ephesians Chapter 3. Let's turn there for
a moment, and this, of course, is the whole motivation of this apostle.
Ephesians 3:1,2
"For this cause (what he had just written in Chapter 2
especially) I Paul, the prisoner of Jesus Christ for (what
people?) you Gentiles, (now back in the Old Testament everything
was for Israel's benefit. But this mans apostleship is for our benefit as
Gentiles.) 2. If ye have heard of the dispensation (this period
of time when God is calling out primarily the Gentile Body of Christ, the
Church in this administration) of the grace of God which is
given me (and then from me ) to you-ward:"
Now that's exactly how I've got it on the board. God revealed to the apostle
Paul these doctrines of Grace, and what did Paul do with them? He didn't do
like Moses did when he received the Law. Moses took it to Israel and Israel
alone. But the apostle Paul takes these revelations of the doctrines of Grace
to everyone. He went to the Jew first in the synagogue and they would reject it
and he would then go down the street to the Gentiles. His primary mission was
to the Gentile world. So this is what he's making reference to. He was given
the Grace of God and he gave it to us Gentiles. Now coming back to Galatians
Chapter 1, let's read verse 10:
Galatians 1:10
"For do I now persuade men, or God? or do I seek to please men? for if I
yet pleased men, I should not be the servant of Christ."
It would be utterly impossible to be a servant or bond slave of Christ if Paul
seeked to please men. Now verse 11. Boy it gets interesting. I wish people
would study Chapters 1 and 2 until they almost know it from memory. Know the
content of these two chapters like you do your name and address, and it will
just blow away all the dust and cobwebs of confusion, because this just opens
it all up. Now verse 11:
Galatians 1:11
"But I certify (I guarantee) you, brethren, that the gospel
which was preached of me is not after man."
All right I'll repeat myself once more. What is the apostle Paul claiming? His
apostleship, and his authority, and not because of any relationship with the
Twelve. Also, remember, he has totally broken with his Jewish past, and now he
is the bond slave of the resurrected and ascended Lord. Now verse 12:
Galatians 1:12
"For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught it, (by
man) but by the revelation of Jesus Christ."
Now you want to remember what it says about this in I Corinthians Chapter 15 -
where we just left off with the clearest explanation of the Gospel and let's
start with verse 5.
I Corinthians 15:5
"And that he was seen of Cephas (Peter) then of the
twelve:"
Remember the word `twelve' was used as a generalized term for a group of
people. Just like the Sanhedrin, or the seventy that was sent forth, and it was
the same way with the disciples; they were known as the Twelve, although here
Paul was speaking of the eleven others, yet he could rightfully call them the
Twelve. That happens a couple of other places in scripture and we know that all
12 of them were not there. Now verse 6:
I Corinthians 15:6-8
"After that, he was seen of above five hundred brethren at once; of whom
the greater part remain unto this present, (which is now about 60 AD or
30 years after the crucifixion) but some are fallen asleep. 7 After that,
he was seen of James; then of all the apostles. 8. And last of all he was seen
of me also, as of one born out of due (or head of the )
time.
Let's go all the way back to the Book of Acts Chapter 22 and begin with verse
17. Here I want you to see why the apostle Paul is making such a big deal over
his having seen and heard all these things from the resurrected Christ. I'm
always trying to get people to see that, if you stay in the Four Gospels (and
there's nothing wrong with reading the Four Gospels. Don't misunderstand me),
that was Christ's before the work of the Cross. That was before the atoning
Blood had been shed, and it was under the Law (Gal. 4:4).
Everything that Christ said was in accordance with the Jewish legal system. You
can find nothing of the Gospel of Grace back there. And Peter carries that on
in the early chapter of Acts. But all this apostle talks about is the
crucified, buried, and risen Lord who has now ascended to glory. Oh what a
difference. You take the little Jewish epistles at the end of our New
Testament, James, I and II Peter, I, II, III John, Jude and Revelation, do you
know what? The word `Cross' is not even mentioned. You won't see the
word `Cross' in those little Jewish epistles. For them it was not the pinnacle
of information like it is for Paul. Paul says, "We preach Christ crucified."
All he knows is the work of the Cross. And it's all because Paul saw our Lord
in resurrection power - he saw him in His ascension.
Acts 22:17-21
"And it came to pass, that, when I was come again to Jerusalem,
(Paul had already been out into the Gentile world) even while I prayed in
the temple, I was in a trance; 18. And saw him (the Lord Jesus)
saying unto me, `Make haste, and get thee quickly out of Jerusalem; for they
will not receive thy testimony concerning me.' 19. And I said, `Lord, they know
that I imprisoned and beat in every synagogue them that believed on thee: 20.
And when the blood of thy martyr Stephen was shed, (back there in Acts
Chapter 7) I also was standing by and consenting unto his death, and kept
the raiment of them that slew him.' 21. And he (the resurrected
ascended Lord) said unto me, `Depart: (from Jerusalem) for
I will send thee far hence unto the Gentiles.'" Do you see how clear
that is? Now if you will come back to Galatians again and verse 12.
Paul is, by Holy Sprit inspiration, distancing himself from the Twelve apostles
of Israel to keep his apostleship pure from any of the legalism of Judaism (of
which Peter, James and John were the epitome). Now verse 12:
Galatians 1:12
"For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught it, but by the
revelation of Jesus Christ." Who is now in glory so it had to be
through some kind of a communication process between the Lord and this apostle.
Now verse 13:
Galatians 1:13a
"For ye have heard of my conversation (now that word
`conversation' is always translated throughout the New Testament, if I'm not
mistaken, as manner of lifestyle.) in time past in the Jews'
religion,..."
Why did the Holy Spirit inspire the apostle Paul to use that term for Judaism?
Because that was what it had become. It had become watered down over the last
1500 years from the giving of the Law on Mt. Sinai, and the establishing of the
priesthood of Israel, and all of the sacrificial worship. In the beginning,
that was pure, that was Law, but oh, as Israel progressed up through those 1500
years, what happened to it? It just got watered down, and degenerated, and
finally, after that, it had become 613 rules and regulations (one of which was
that they could only walk so far on the Sabbath day). That's what the Law had
become and it was now a religion.
There was no saving power in the Judaism of Christ's day. Oh, there were a few
bonified believers, we know there were. Zacharias, and Elizabeth, the parents
of John the Baptist. Joseph and Mary no doubt were, but oh, it was precious few
Jews that were true believers when Christ came to Israel. The majority were not
true believers but they were religious. Oh, you bet they were religious. They
kept the feast days, they practiced the sacrifices. You know, Josephus claimed
that, at the time of Christ, one million animals were sacrificed every year.
Now that means that a bunch of animals had to be sacrificed every day. But
whether it was that many or something less than that, don't ever lose sight of
the fact that the Jews religion of Christ's day was, to the hilt, a practicing
of those 613 rules and regulations.
_______
LESSON TWO * PART IV
PERVERTED GOSPEL
GALATIANS 1:1 - 1:14
Now we're going to pick up where we left off in verse 13. Remember, as we
introduced the Book of Galatians, Paul is frantically responding to false
teachings that have come into the congregations that he had established up in
Asia Minor, which is what we call today, Turkey. Galatia was pretty much in the
middle of Turkey and especially the Galatian churches were probably in the
Southern half of that part of Turkey. They were being bombarded by false
teachers who were claiming that they couldn't be saved by faith and faith
alone, but they also had to be circumcised, and they had to keep the Law of
Moses or they couldn't be saved. Does that ring a bell? Well, we
don't have circumcision as such, but we've got a lot of other things that are
required that are in the same category. It's that which you can do and that
which is of works and it does nothing but bring down the anathema of God
Himself. Now verse 13.
Galatians 1:13a
"For ye have heard of my conversation (manner of living) in
time past in the Jews' religion,..."
He was a Pharisee of the Pharisees, he says in the Book of Philippians. I'm
positive that he was a member of the Sanhedrin, and, as such, he must have been
a husband and father or he wouldn't have been a member. I feel that way because
he says, in Acts Chapter 26, that when they were persecuting these Jewish
believers, and they were brought before the religious counsels, he, along with
others, voted to have them put to death or have them thrown in prison. So that
tells us quite a bit right there. So Paul was high up in the echelons of
Judaism as it was known at the time of Christ with the Temple worship. Now
reading on:
Galatians 1:13b
"...how that beyond measure (it was despicable) I
persecuted the church (assembly) of God, and wasted
it:"
Now I use the word `assembly' here on purpose because too many people get
confused by thinking that the word "church" always means what we call
the Body of Christ, and it doesn't. Always remember the word translated
`church' in our New Testament is the Greek word `ecclesia' (it can be
spelled with two c's or two k's). All that word meant in its true translated
form was "a called out assembly." It doesn't mean something with
pastors, and bishops and deacons necessarily, although when Paul speaks of the
Body of Christ and the local Church, then, yes, it does. Now the word
`ecclesia' then was what Stephen referred to in Acts Chapter 7 when he said
"The church in the wilderness." Remember that? Well, that wasn't a church,
but it was a called-out assembly because God called Israel out of Egypt unto
Himself. And it was called an ecclesia.
The group of Jewish believers in Jerusalem was a called-out assembly, or
ecclesia, in Jerusalem because they had separated themselves from the
run-of-the-mill Judaisers. I maintain they were not yet the Body of Christ.
Back in the Book of Acts there was another instance, when it's anything but a
spiritual group of people, when they rioted in Ephesus. They ran into the
theater, they were a mob, they were rioting because of what the apostle Paul
had been accomplishing among those pagan people and what's it called? An
ecclesia. Now, fortunately the King James translators didn't use the word
`church' for that, so what did they use? Assembly. So the assembly was being
addressed and warned that the Roman authorities were going to call them into
question. So we have to be careful how we let these terminologies either
confuse us or set us straight. So when Paul says:
Galatians 13b
"...I persecuted the church of God, and wasted it:"
I prefer the word `assembly' because that's what it was. It was a called-out,
separated group of Jews who I do not feel were, as yet, under the terminology
of the Body of Christ which is something so different. Take that for what it's
worth; you may not agree with me, but that's fine. So Paul persecuted the
assembly and wasted it. Let's go back to the Book of Acts and get the
Scriptural account, and you can see for yourself what he is talking about.
Let's turn to Chapter 7 verse 57. Here we have Stephen now, who has addressed
the leaders of the Nation of Israel. He has gone through that whole historical
record of the nation, and he brings them all the way up to Christ's crucifixion
and rejection. He proclaims as Christ Himself had been doing, and as Peter had
done at Pentecost, that He was the Christ, the Messiah of Israel. But remember
Peter said back there in Chapter 2 that they had murdered Him.
Acts 2:23b
"...ye have taken, and by wicked hands have crucified and
slain:"
Acts 3:15a
"And killed the Prince of life,..."
Peter goes on to say that God raised Him from the dead, and He is still in a
position to be your King. And like I said earlier: when Saul of Tarsus, that
religious practitioner of Judaism, saw the inroads that Jesus of Nazareth and
the Twelve were making into Judaism, he just about went into orbit as we would
say. And he fought it tooth and nail and was trying to stamp it out. Saul was
sincere - sincerely wrong; but he was sincere in hating these Jews who had
embraced Jesus of Nazareth. Look at Stephen's account in Acts 7.
Acts 7:57-60
"Then they (these Jewish leaders) cried out with a loud
voice, and stopped their ears, and ran upon him (Stephen) with
one accord. 58. And cast him out of the city, and stoned him: and the witnesses
laid down their clothes at a young man's feet, whose name was Saul.
(now he's thirty something. He was about the same age as Christ.) 59. And
they stoned Stephen, calling upon God, and saying, `Lord Jesus, receive my
spirit.' 60. And he kneeled down, and cried with a loud voice, `Lord, lay not
this sin to their charge.' And when he had said this, he fell
asleep."
Recently we had one of our television watchers send us a tape of their
preacher's Sunday morning sermon. The sermon that he preached was a gem, and I
just listened to it from start to finish, it was a good one. He made several
points and one of those points was, "It is not appropriate for us in this age
of Grace in the post-resurrection era to refer to the Lord as simply
"Jesus." That was His name in the flesh of humiliation. This
preacher made the point and that's why I'm repeating it. Never in all of the
scriptural accounts did the Twelve address Him as "Jesus" They called Him
either "Lord" or "Master," but they never called him Jesus. Now the
ridiculers did, but His followers never did, and it's the same way here, do you
see it? Look at verse 59 again.
Acts 7:59
"And they stoned Stephen, calling upon God, and saying, `Lord Jesus,
receive my spirit.'"
I've said before that the only appropriate address for Him today is either
Christ, or the Lord Jesus, or the Lord Jesus Christ, or the Lord, but don't
ever approach Him as just Jesus because it is not a scriptural application.
Looking again at verse 60:
Acts 7:60a
"And he kneeled down, and cried with a loud voice, `Lord,...'"
Now it's the same way with the apostle Paul with a couple of exceptions. I know
in I Thessalonians Chapter 4 he will say, "For if we believe that Jesus
died and rose again..." But most every place else he uses the term
Lord Jesus Christ, or Jesus Christ but never Jesus alone. It's
just not appropriate now after His resurrection. Now come over to Chapter 9 and
we'll pick up a description of Saul of Tarsus in his hatred for anything
connected to the followers of Jesus Christ.
Acts 9:1a
"And Saul, (the one we just read about in Chapter 7) yet
breathing out threatenings and slaughter..."
Now remember, I've mentioned in a lesson or two that the Judaistic religious
people had clout with Rome. They had quite a bit of clout. In fact, it was just
their own obstinacy that brought down the city of Jerusalem by Titus. But the
Romans had a lot of respect for Judaism. The reason they persecuted the
Christians so was because it was something totally new and so the Romans
treated it like a sect or something. But Judaism had the respect of the Roman
authorities, because it was considered one of the ancient religions.
Also remember that the Jews from one end of the Roman empire to the other would
send vast amounts of money to the Temple as offerings, and never was a dollar
lost. Never did they lose an ounce of those gifts because Rome recognized and
protected it. Now, as I said before, they also had enough clout with the Roman
Government that they could demand extradition of Jews that they wanted to deal
with in their own religion, and bring them back to Jerusalem. And that's why
Saul had the authority to go Damascus which was outside of Israel, and yet Rome
permitted them to do just that. Now read on:
Acts 9:1,2
"And Saul, yet breathing out threatening and slaughter against the
disciples of the Lord, went unto the high priest. 2. And desired of him letters
to Damascus to the synagogues, (see he wasn't going to bother the
Syrian population, all he wanted was these Jews who had embraced faith in the
Messiah.) that if he found any of this way, whether they were men or
women, he might bring them bound unto Jerusalem."
Saul was vicious, he had no mercy. He didn't care whether they were young or
old, or men or women; if they had embraced Jesus of Nazareth as their Messiah,
then Saul's attitude was, "They're not worth living, get rid of them, they are
nothing but a threat to my religion." Have you got the picture? Now come back
to the Book of Galatians. And the poor man never got over that for hurting so
many. I imagine as he suffered all of the ramifications of his apostleship he
must have constantly remembered it's coming around. What goes around comes
around, and his was coming around. Now verse 13.
Galatians 1:13
"For ye have heard of my conversation (manner of living) in
time past in the Jews' religion, how that beyond measure I persecuted
(how I chased them to the ends of my authority) the church
(assembly) of God and wasted it:"
What does wasted it mean? Utterly destroyed wherever he went. Now he had
evidently made so much headway in the area of Jerusalem and Judea that he
thought he had pretty much cleaned house, and there wasn't anything left to do
so he said, "Okay, High Priest, let me go to Damascus, because there are still
some of these people up there and we know there are." A lot of these Jewish
believers who had to flee Jerusalem, for fear of Saul of Tarsus and the other
religious persecutioners, did migrate up into the area of Galilee and some as
far north as Damascus. Now verse 14. Not only was Saul a religious zealot who
had no mercy, who had no compunction in putting these Jewish believers to
death, on top of that he was motivated for money. Does that ring a bell?
Galatians 1:14a
"And profited in the Jews' religion..."
Now I've told my classes that you can go into any religion of the world, and
you go into their headquarters, their upper echelons, what do you find? Wealth.
Tremendous wealth, and where have they gotten it? From the peons down there on
the lower level. Judaism was no different. Why did Jesus drive out the money
changers in the Temple? What was going on? Hey, it was corruption. These poor
people living out in the small alleys and huts of Jerusalem couldn't afford to
go out into the Judean hills and buy a nice beautiful lamb, and bring it to the
Temple. Nor did they have whatever it took to do that. So what did they have to
do?
They had to buy some kind of a sacrifice for some kind of a peon's wage in
order to fulfill the demands of their religion, and so what were these
religious leaders setting up? A market place right in the Temple. And they
would try to charge high prices for whatever these poor people had to have,
whether it was a turtledove, or maybe a little lamb that had something wrong
with it. And remember God required a lamb without blemish so this was also a
controversy between God and Israel. But these rascals of Israel were taking
advantage of the poor people and selling them the off scouring of stuff that
they could use for a sacrifice, and charging them bloated prices, and why? The
same motivation that people have today. To get rich! Old Saul was right in the
middle of that. He was making big bucks - if you don't believe me then you need
to go with us to Jerusalem.
Usually we get a chance to go down and see the home of Caiaphas the High
Priest. His home has been dug out of the archeological diggings, and it's quite
a few feet below street level. But even after all of these 2000 years of laying
under the dirt and sand of the Middle East, you can see by the materials that
were on their walls, and with all the bathrooms that they had, they lived
sumptuously.
In fact, in one area of that house you can see three or four layers where our
guide pointed out that Caiaphas' wife must have gone to Athens and she came
back and said, "Honey we've got to have this on our walls because after all
that's what all the rich people in Athens have. And you can imagine old
Caiaphas saying, "Okay, Okay." So maybe a year or so later she went to Rome and
saw something there that was even prettier and came back and said, "Honey,
you've got what it takes, I've got to have this new material on our walls." And
he says, "Well, well Okay." So there was about four layers and you could see
that each one was beautiful.
They must have cost tremendous amounts of money. They lived sumptuously. Why?
Because they were feeding off the income of that religion. Hey, religion has
always been that way. I tell people to look at any religion on the face of the
earth tonight, go up into the higher echelons and you'll find the same thing.
It hasn't changed. The human race hasn't changed one iota in 6000 years. As
they get more they get more corrupt, remember total corruption breeds total
corruption. The more corrupt people get, the more corruption there is, and
corruption just keeps feeding. Listen, this was Saul of Tarsus. This is the
point I wanted to make. This guy was a Pharisee of the Pharisees. He was
corrupt in the religion, he didn't have any mercy for those who opposed it and
so he could drag them into the dungeons or commit them to stoning, it never
bothered him then. Now read on about his account.
Galatians 1:14a
"And profited in the Jews' religion..."
You know I detest the word `religion.' The Bible always uses it in a bad light.
I think in the Book of James there is probably an exception, but for the most
part the word `religion' in scripture is a bad word, just like it is here. Paul
says, `I was profiting in the Jews' religion,' because it was a bad, corrupt
system. Now I don't have to tell you that. All you have to do is go back and
read Jesus' account with the Pharisees, and what were they? They were corrupt.
Remember when one of them smote the apostle Paul on the face? What did Paul
call him? You whited sepulcher. That's pretty strong language, and he had to
take it back, because he didn't know that he was talking to the high priest. I
think there's more there than reads between the lines, but anyway that's what
he called him. Now finishing the verse:
Galatians 1:14
"And profited in the Jews religion above many my equals in mine own
nation, (he was probably making more bucks than most of them)
being more exceedingly zealous of the traditions of my
fathers."
Always remember this, "Religion always banks on traditions rather than
doctrine. And when we get a little further in Galatians, I'm going to show you
that things haven't changed one bit in the past 2000 years. Oh we're not
dealing with circumcision, or Pharisees, and Judaism, but we're dealing with
the same kind of mentality. It's the same thing, it's religion, and all of its
demands on poor unsuspecting people. But look what he says:
Galatians 1:14b
"...being more exceedingly zealous of the traditions of my
fathers."
In other words, Saul was proud of his genealogy, and he probably was even able
to chase it clear back into the Old Testament economy. Remember, his father
must have been some kind of a man of influence as a Roman citizen, because
Paul, remember, was also a Roman citizen, so that tells you something about his
father and probably his grandfather. All of these things come into play when
you look at the man's religious fanaticism. If he could stamp out all of these
Jews who had followed Christ then he thought he was the winner.
_______
LESSON THREE * PART I
THE GOSPEL OF THE CIRCUMCISION AND THE GOSPEL OF THE UNCIRCUMCISION
GALATIANS 1:15 - 2:9
Now this is Bible study so let's begin. You know I would like to get every
person from whatever station in society or whatever age group interested in the
Word of God. The Bible is still the greatest Book on earth, and it's not as
difficult as most people have been led to believe. The secret to understanding
the Bible is to separate some of these things that you cannot mix. And so this
where we come in, especially with the apostle Paul and his writings. All of his
writings are of Grace and Grace alone. So if there seems to be a contradiction
in Scripture, see if it's under Grace or Law as the two won't mix.
Now let's jump right into today's lesson in Galatians Chapter 1 and verse 15.
Also remember that this little Book of Galatians is primarily dealing with
Churches that were being bombarded with a perversion of the Gospel which Paul
says:
Galatians 1:7a
"Which is not another; (Gospel) but there be some that
trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ."
It's not a completely different Gospel, But what they were doing to Paul's
Gospel of Grace was adding law and legalism, and works. Now nothing thrills us
more than to get letter after letter that exclaims, "My what a joy. It's
like someone took a load off my shoulders when I came out of all that legalism,
and realized that it's in Grace and Grace alone that we have to find our
salvation (I Corinthians 15:1-4)" So this is the whole theme now that the
apostle Paul is still defending his apostleship as he did all through the
Corinthian letters.
I can see now why the Holy Spirit put the Corinthian letters where they are,
and why Romans is where it is, even though they were written later. Paul
declares in Romans the basic doctrine of his Gospel, and then in the Corinthian
letters he had to correct and reprove them for having so many other problems.
Not so much like the Galatians with legalism, but they had divisions and other
problems so he had to correct those problems and in correcting them he had to
defend his apostleship.
Now I know you're probably sick and tired of hearing me say this, but I have to
get this across.
As Paul's writings and his letters are so often totally ignored, we have to
remember what an Ivy League president in the late 1800's once said. He said,
"We must realize that it's either back, back, back, to the doctrines of Paul or
it's on, on, on to an apostasy." I believe that more than ever. If we can't get
folks back to an understanding of Paul's doctrines, then Christianity is in
dire straits. Now verse 15. So, in this verse, Paul is pretty much still
declaring his apostleship and declaring his authority and so he says:
Galatians 1:15
"But when it pleased God, who separated me from my mother's womb, and
called me by his grace."
Now that's a Pauline expression. Called me by his Grace. All you have to
do is stop and reflect for a moment. What else but Grace could have done what
God did with that man on the road to Damascus. Here he was trying to stamp out
anyone in Israel that had proclaimed Christ as the Messiah, and had become
separated from the mainstream of Judaism, although they were still keeping
Temple worship and the Law. Evidently Saul had pretty much cleansed the
homeland and now he had gone to the chief rulers to get permission to go to
Syria and bring back the Jewish believers to Jerusalem for trial, punishment
and death. So on the road to Damascus with that heart of absolute hatred with
anything contrary to Judaism, the Lord called Him by His Grace. If there was
ever a man that didn't deserve what God did for him it was Saul. But, contrary
to what most people think, we have to do to get right with God. Saul, like
Israel of old when they stood on the shores of the Red Sea, did absolutely
nothing. Nothing but helplessly call out, "What would you have me do?"
Remember in Genesis when Noah and his family were in the ark? Do you remember
what the picture of the sealant of those wood boards were? It was the word
"pitch" but in the Hebrew it meant "atonement" So it was the
atonement that sealed out the flood waters of Noah's ark. Now with the
atonement in place and the ark secure, Noah and his family were totally safe.
Well, it's the same when you come to Israel standing at their kitchen table in
their little huts in Egypt. And the death angel is flying over, and wailing and
weeping is carrying on in Egypt, and yet, there, those Jewish families could
stand safe and secure because the blood was on the door. Then sometime later
they stood on the shores of the Red Sea with no hope. And when God spoke, He
didn't tell them to do anything except to stand still and see the power of God.
And, of course, that was the opening of the Red Sea. Now this is exactly where
Paul had to find himself. Just exactly like Israel, there was only going to be
one place of safety for the man, and that is the Blood of Christ, and how is he
going to appropriate it? Not by doing something, but rather, once the Lord
spoke to him, all he could say was, "Lord what would you have me do?" And it
hasn't changed a bit. So this is what he is referring to when he says in verse
15:
Galatians 1:15,16a
"But when it pleased God, who separated me from my mother's womb, and
called me by his grace, (Now verse 16.) To reveal his Son
(Christ) in me, that I might preach him among the heathen;
(anybody that is not a Jew)
Now let's go back to the Book of Acts and look at that account, for after all,
with Bible study we have to use references as much as possible to see that all
of scripture agrees. We never pick up a verse here and there in order to build
some ideas, but all of scripture will substantiate hopefully what we are
teaching. In Acts Chapter 9, after that experience on the road to Damascus, we
find God working both ends to the middle. He's working on Saul outside the
city, He's also working on Ananias inside the city of Damascus. So now we're
going to pick it up where God is speaking to Ananias, this believing Jew,
somewhere in the city of Damascus.
Acts 9:11-15a
"And the Lord said unto him, `Arise, and go into the street which is
called Straight, and inquire in the house of Judas for one called Saul, of
Tarsus: for, behold, he prayeth. 12. And hath seen in a vision a man named
Ananias coming in, and putting his hand on him, that he might receive his
sight.' 13. Then Ananias answered, `Lord, I have heard by many of this man, how
much evil he hath done to thy saints at Jerusalem: (Saul's
persecutions) 14. And here he hath authority from the chief priests to
bind all that call on thy name.' (and here it is in verse 15. Oh we
want people from one end of this country to the other to understand this.
15. But the Lord said unto him, (Ananias) `Go thy way: for he is
a chosen vessel unto me, to bear my name before the Gentiles,...'"
Now a lot of people don't realize this, but when Christ came in His earthly
ministry to the Nation of Israel and He chose the Twelve, He had instructions
for them.
Matthew 10:5
"These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying,
`Go not into the way of the Gentiles, (the non Jew) and
into any city of the Samaritans (Samaritans were half breeds)
enter ye not: 6. But go rather to the lost sheep of the
house of Israel.'"
Now that was a commandment. They were to go to no one but Jews. And the Twelve
understood that better than most preachers and teachers today. The Twelve never
lost sight of that as we see in Acts Chapter 11. And this is many years after
the Cross and Pentecost. I just want you to see how those early Jewish
believers adhered to that commandment that Jesus gave to the Twelve. Now
there are a lot of people that think that as soon as Jesus began His ministry,
the Church began, and God's Grace and the Gospel went out to the whole world.
That's not according to the Bible. According to this Book He ministered only to
the Nation of Israel for the whole three years. That's why most preachers and
teachers think the Church today is Israel. That way they can try to make it all
fit, but listen, Law and Grace won't mix.
And even after His ascension, and Peter begins at Pentecost, then for several
years it was that same format. They could not go to the non-Jew.
Acts 11:19
"Now they which were scattered abroad upon the persecution that arose
about Stephen travelled as far as Phenice, and Cyprus, and Antioch, preaching
the word (Old Testament) to none but unto the Jews
only."
Do you see how plain that is? Now this is about seven years after Pentecost.
They are still adhering to the commandments that Jesus gave to the Twelve in
Matthew 10:5,6. The Lord Jesus didn't want the Gentiles to have anything to do
with the Jews' religion, and we can look at that now and see that the Lord
wanted the apostle Paul to go to the Gentiles and give them pure Grace. Now
coming back to Acts Chapter 9. Maybe this will be more enlightening as to why
the Lord Jesus had to make such an emphasis to this man Ananias, as to what was
the purpose of saving this Jewish zealot who had been putting Jews to death for
having embraced Jesus of Nazareth as their Messiah. And yet he has to
understand that now there's going to be a change of direction in God's plan.
People must understand that, from Genesis Chapter 12 to Acts Chapter 9, it's
God dealing with the Nation of Israel. Don't try to draw the Body of Christ
into those areas. But here in Acts Chapter 9 there is going to be a change,
there's going to be a fork in the road, and we're going to see it explicitly as
we go on in Galatians. Now looking at verse 15 again:
Acts 9:15
"But the Lord said unto him, `Go thy way: for he is a chosen vessel unto
me, to bear my name before the Gentiles, and kings, and the children of Israel:
16. For I will shew him (Saul) how great things he must suffer
for my name sake.'"
Did he suffer? Oh, did he ever. In the Corinthian letters we saw how he was
beaten, stoned, and scourged, and cold and naked, and many times sick, and
living in fear for his life, and all because of what the Lord Jesus had
promised him here. Well, now if you will come back with me to Galatians Chapter
1. God is going to reveal Himself to this apostle, Saul of Tarsus, who is now
Paul and reading on in verse 16:
Galatians 1:16b
"...immediately I conferred not with flesh and blood:"
Now we know a lot of people think this verse should read that immediately he
went up to Jerusalem to check it out with the Twelve. That would have been the
logical thing wouldn't it? To go back to Jerusalem, and say, "Hey, Peter, you
guys were with Him for three years. I want to know everything that He taught
you. But you see the Holy Spirit here is making it so positive that He's not
going to let this man be tainted whatsoever by what the Twelve had learned at
the feet of Jesus. The Lord Jesus now has something totally different to
show this man, and he doesn't want it mixed up. But you see, men are adept at
mixing things up. Men have been mixing it ever since the apostle Paul left the
scene. And I'm trying my very best to unmix it, and to bring it back again to
this clear division between what God did with Israel, and what He's doing with
the Gentile, and the Body of Christ.
Galatians 1:16b
"...I conferred not with flesh and blood:"
In other words, with other human beings, why? Because he's dealing with the
flesh and bone, the Lord Jesus up in glory. Now verse 17. And for emphasis, to
make sure that we get it straight. he repeats that.
Galatians 1:17
"Neither went I up to Jerusalem to them which were apostles before
me; (Paul never takes away the authority of Peter and the other eleven
apostles, so far as their position as apostles of Israel. But on the other hand
he's also not going to let them usurp his authority as the apostle of the
Gentiles.) but I went into Arabia, and returned again unto
Damascus,
Now the first thing I like to do when you see that word `Arabia' in verse 17 is
take you to Chapter 4 here in Galatians.
Galatians 4:25a
"For this Agar (Paul is making an allegory here but we won't
cover it now) is mount Sinai in Arabia,..."
Now, from that little statement of Paul, I have to feel that, since this man is
going to be delegated to receive a whole new Body of Truth from the ascended
Lord, and he is going to be given the responsibly to take it out to the whole
Gentile world, God did much the same thing with Moses at that same Mount Sinai.
You have seen me put that on the board before, and we'll do it again now.
When the Lord spoke to Moses there at Mount Sinai and gave him the Law,
Moses took the Law down to Israel. And only Israel received the
ramifications of the Law, although the Law certainly affected the whole human
race.
But here we are at the time of Paul some 1500 years later, and God hasn't
changed. God is still the same, as He never changes. But now He's dealing with
a different individual. He now gives to Paul these doctrines of Grace, which
is imbedded in what Paul is always referring to as the mysteries. And
then this apostle is instructed to take these doctrines of Grace to the
Gentiles, and for the ones who will listen to him in the Nation of Israel.
That, I think, just answers all of our questions as to what part of the
Scriptures are we to depend on. Now it's all God's Word, don't ever take that
away from me. Every word in this Book is the inspired Word of God, but He has
made it so plain that this man is the apostle of the Gentiles. In fact, seeing
Jerry Poole here today, I've got to use this verse. There are several verses
that Jerry, when he first was bombarded by them 16 years ago would come up and
would say, "Now Les I never saw that before, so repeat it, repeat it and repeat
it." So that's why I do it. Go back to the Book of Romans Chapter 11:13. And
this says it so plainly. There's no arguing over it.
Romans 11:13
"For I speak to you Gentiles, inasmuch as I am the apostle of the
Gentiles, I magnify mine office:"
In other words Paul is not going to back down for anything as that role of the
apostle of the Gentiles. Why can't people adhere to that? That's Paul's
authority. That's why, as we saw in the Corinthian letters, he was always
defending that authority. Now come back to Galatians. So evidently he went down
to Arabia, Mount Sinai, and, of course, there's a difference of opinion among
Bible scholars and theologians whether he spent the whole three years at Sinai
as I believe he did. Or, did he spend a portion of time at Sinai and then go
back to Damascus, and then at the end of the three years begin his ministry. I
have to feel that the Lord took that whole three years of dealing with this man
all by himself down there in the desert at Mount Sinai.
Now the reason I take that approach is that, when you understand all the trials
and tribulations that this man went through, most men would have given up long,
long ago. But the apostle Paul always kept pressing on. Why? Because I think
this three-year experience was so imbedded in the man's makeup that he could do
nothing less. Then, on top of that, there were several times that the Lord
Jesus referred to him face to face. Paul says that He appeared unto me. So all
of these things contributed to his constant pushing forward against all
opposition. So, after a three-year stint, which I think was down at Arabia, he
finally gets up to Jerusalem to meet Peter face-to-face for the first time. Now
I imagine that was quite a meeting, because, after all, they're coming from two
totally different backgrounds.
Galatians 1:18
"Then after three years I went up to Jerusalem to see Peter, and abode
with him fifteen days."
_______
LESSON THREE * PART II
THE GOSPEL OF THE CIRCUMCISION AND THE GOSPEL OF THE UNCIRCUMCISION
GALATIANS 1:15 - 2:9
Now back to Galatians Chapter 1, and we hope you take your Bible and study with
us. We don't want people to say, "Well, that's what Les says." I want people to
say, "My Bible says such and such." Be able to confirm whatever you may be
sharing with someone from the Word. This Book is the authority; this is the
only thing that we have to go on. I always emphasize that I am a firm proponent
that this is the inspired Word of God from Genesis 1:1 to Revelation 22:21.
Remember when Paul speaks in the first person it is still inspired of God, and
it is God's Word and we can rest upon it.
So let's begin our study, and in our last lesson we left off at verse 18, where
Paul had now finished his three-year hiatus, evidently with the Lord alone down
in Mount Sinai in Arabia. I had someone ask me, "Why would it take three years
to get the revelations?" I answered, "It probably took 2 1/2 years to get
Judaism out of his system." And this lady said, "That makes sense, because it
took me forever to get my old religion out of my system." And this is a
possibility because Saul of Tarsus had been a Jews' Jew, a Hebrew of the
Hebrew, a Pharisee of the Pharisees, and educated at the feet of the greatest
rabbi of that time. So you know he was saturated with Judaism. He was more
religious than many of his peers, and he was human. We're all human, and
when we've had something drummed into us for years and years, it takes the
power of God to cleanse us of all that.
There is such a stark difference between Judaism (and all of it's rules and
regulations and Law-keeping, and Phariseeism on the part of Paul) and the Grace
of God (receiving all of this free for nothing without lifting a finger). Hey,
that flies in the face of human thinking, but this is where we have to begin.
Now we don't stay there, but that's where we begin. That's where salvation
comes in, when we just say, "Lord there is nothing that I can do, but I believe
You've done it all, and I believe that on top of dying for me, You also rose
from the dead. I believe it with all my heart." Then, yes, God expects us to
move out and live a life of service, and that's the thrilling part of it.
There is a man in our television audience in a distant state who has just come
out of one of these binding religions, and he is so thrilled. He's called just
about every time that he sees another truth. He can't get over the fact that
he'd been blinded to all this for so long. Now he's begun a Bible study on his
own, and I think last night was his third Bible study, and he was so thrilled.
He said "Les, I just can't wait until tonight." Well that's the way it goes
when you come out from underneath all that pressure of a religion of having to
do something. Then, to step into the freedom of Grace, it's just like setting a
bird free out of its cage.
Now this is where the apostle Paul is coming from. He has been weighed down
with Judaism and all of its demands of a religious leader, and now he's been
set free. So Paul has had three years to shed himself of all that, and to
absorb some of the mysteries. I maintain that the things that he shares with us
in the prison Epistles of Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians and Philemon, he
probably had revealed to him while in prison in Caesarea before he got to Rome.
Because, by the time he gets to Rome, all these new revelations are fresh on
his mind as he begins to write those letters. But back here in his earlier
Epistles I think of all of these tremendous doctrines that are so separated
from legalism, and Judaism, and yet they all fit. It isn't something that's
just like a thorn in all the rest of scripture. No it all fits so beautifully.
In fact, I know I've shared it with some of my classes about the lady who
called and told me that the scripture that her preacher used for Sunday was out
of Matthew 19:16,17.
Matthew 19:16,17
"And, behold, one came and said unto him, `Good Master, what good thing
shall I do, that I may have eternal life?' 17. And he said unto him, `Why
callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou
wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.'"
She said, "This morning I was watching you and you said we weren't under the
commandments, but rather Grace." She said, "I'm confused." Well, I gave her a
one-on-one Bible study. I brought her up all through the Abrahamic Covenant,
and Christ's earthly ministry, and the Nation of Israel's rejection and the
raising of Saul of Tarsus who became the apostle Paul, the apostle to us
Gentiles. And the revelation of the mysteries that was given only to him, and
how that now, since the work of the Cross was complete, He has been resurrected
from the dead, He's gone back to glory and revealed these truths. How that now
there was no need to work for salvation because it's all done. After I
explained all this she was silent for a moment and said, "It's so logical isn't
it?" Yes, it's so logical that if it's all done then why try to work, work,
work to still do more. Now this is what the man is trying to get across so he
says in verse 18:
Galatians 1:18-20
"Then after three years I went up to Jerusalem to see Peter, and abode
with him fifteen days, (that's only two weeks and a day) 19. But
other of the apostles (the other eleven) saw I none, save James
the Lord's brother. 20. Now the things which I write unto you, (the
Gentiles up in Galatia. He's writing to us even today) behold, before
God, I lie not."
Does that sound familiar? What did he tell the Corinthians in their letters?
"I didn't bring you a corrupt message. I didn't bring you something that has
been adulterated." Now here we have it in a little different language, but
it's the same thought. Now verse 21.
Galatians 1:21
"Afterwards (after he had been to Jerusalem, and the three years
with the Lord at Sinai, and after he is ready to fulfill that commission to go
to the Gentiles that we saw in the last lesson in Acts Chapter 9 then) I
came into the regions of Syria and Cilicia;"
Now I think most of you know your Bible geography well enough to know that
Cilicia was just around the corner of the Mediterranean Sea, up in the area of
Saul's home town of Tarsus. So he's not that far removed from Palestine, but
yet he is in total Gentile territory when he begins his ministry after the two
weeks with Peter. He goes from Jerusalem directly up to his home area of
Cilicia. Verse 22:
Galatians 1:22
"And was unknown by face unto the (assemblies or) churches
of Judaea which were in Christ: "
Now why did the Holy Spirit inspire the man to make a statement like that? Why
is he letting us know that he had nothing to do with those Jewish congregations
in Palestine? Because this man is going to be separated from all of that. He
has no ministry to the Jews there in Judaea. No more than the Twelve had a
ministry to the Gentiles when Jesus sent them out. Do you see the difference?
It's just a complete fork in the road. This man is going to be sent to the very
opposite direction that Peter and the other apostles were sent. So he goes up
into a totally new Gentile area, and no doubt there were some Jews in these
areas as they were in areas of the whole Roman empire. Now verse 23:
Galatians 1:23
"But (these Jewish believers down in the area of Jerusalem and
Judea) they had heard only, That he which persecuted us in times past now
preacheth the faith which once he destroyed. 24. And they glorified God in
me."
Of course they did, for after all it's the same God, it's the same Christ - but
whereas the Jewish believers had come in by virtue of the kingdom economy and
the kingdom Gospel, yet this man is going in a different direction but still
serving the same God. Never lose sight of that because someone sent me an
article the other day about theologians who are trying to promote the theory
that the apostle Paul, even though he was the founder of Christianity, was in
complete contradiction and in opposition of what Jesus taught. I know that
promotes book sales, but how can you come to such a conclusion. It's not in
opposition, but it is a difference in His program. It's no longer under Law,
but it's the same God, it's the same Christ. So how can they say that Paul was
in direct opposition to the teaching of Christ when in Ephesians Chapter 3:1
Paul says:
Ephesians 3:1
"For this cause (because of what he has written in Chapter 2)
I Paul, the prisoner of Jesus Christ (but for what
purpose?) for you Gentiles,"
Paul is not in opposition to the teachings of Jesus; it's an extension of them.
Now that the life of Christ was culminated there at the Cross, and then picked
up in resurrection power, of course that makes it different, but it's still the
same God. Now back to the Book of Galatians, and we're ready for Chapter 2. Now
remember we've seen him saved on the road to Damascus and we've seen him spend
three years either divided between Arabia and Damascus or, as I feel, all down
at Arabia. And so he says:
Galatians 2:1a
"Then fourteen years after..."
After what? His conversion. Once in a while the Lord has seen fit
to give us the time element, and the chronologers can jump on this and they can
pretty much reconstruct the whole time-table even though there is nothing
definitive; and, consequently, I have not found two chronologers that agree.
They are always at least a few years apart on their estimation of some of these
things. But in this verse here is a benchmark as Paul says:
Galatians 2:1
"Then fourteen years after (his conversion) I went up again
to Jerusalem with Barnabas, and took Titus with me also."
Well where did Paul hook up with Barnabas? Up at Antioch. And when did he get
to Antioch? After he had been up to Cilicia. So we know there's a time frame in
there between his conversion and this counsel in Jerusalem. Now I think, again,
that most chronologers feel that this counsel in Jerusalem was somewhere around
51 or 52 AD. Now, you want to remember that Christ was crucified, and Pentecost
took place, in 29 AD. Then I feel (and again some chronologers also feel) that
there was a seven-year interval between Pentecost and the stoning of Stephen
which would be in 36 AD. This was when Saul was at the height of persecuting
those Jewish believers, and had brought about the stoning of Stephen. Then in
the next year (37 AD) we have Saul's conversion on the road to Damascus. Then
adding three years for Arabia it would take us up to 40 AD when he returned to
Cilicia. But if he went back up to Jerusalem here in Galatians Chapter 2, then
14 years after 37 AD would take you up to 51 AD.
Now the only reason I do this is to show that all during the Book of Acts time
is moving on. This isn't all happening just in a year or so. Time has been
going by, and now here we are 14 years after his conversion. He has been out in
the Gentile world preaching his Gospel of Grace, and in the meantime, as we saw
in the Corinthian letters in our previous program, the Judaisers from Jerusalem
are opposing him at every turn. Whether they were believing Jews, whether they
were under the influences of Peter and the eleven, or whether they were from
the Orthodox, it made no difference. They would come into these Gentile
congregations and say, "You can't be saved by Paul's Gospel alone. You also
have to keep the Law, and practice circumcision or you can't be saved." All
right let me show you where the Scripture makes that so plain. We have to go
back to the Book of Acts again for that. I know when we taught Acts, we used
Galatians, and, when we teach Galatians, we'll use Acts. That's sensible, isn't
it? Back to Acts Chapter 15 and verse 1. I maintain (and not everybody is going
to agree with me), that this counsel in Jerusalem is Luke's account, whereas in
Galatians Chapter 2 it's the same counsel, but it's Paul's account. And they
all go together. Now then, let's go back to Acts 15 first. I've got to take my
time here. I have to force myself to slow down because otherwise you're going
to lose the thread.
Acts 15:1
"And certain men which came down from Judaea taught the
brethren,...
Now look at that. Analyze it. What kind of Jew would come into a Gentile
congregation and begin to teach them? Well, not the orthodox, nor the Pharisee.
They wouldn't have anything to do with something like this. After all, what
were Gentiles in the mind of a Pharisee? They were dirty dogs! So they
certainly wouldn't. So who must have been coming into these Gentile
congregations? Jewish believers that believed that Jesus was the Christ. Now
they weren't believers in Paul's Gospel. They were still believers that Jesus
was Who He said He was. He was the Messiah of Israel. And so they are still
under the Law. Now a lot of people don't realize that. Those early Jewish
believers, under Peter's preaching, were still Law-keeping Jews.
It's so evident that I don't have to show you the scripture. You remember when
Peter had the vision of the sheet and all these creatures were in there and
they came down. And what did the Lord command Peter to do? "Rise Peter. Kill
and eat." And what did Peter answer? "No way, Lord. Why, I've never eaten
anything unclean." Why hadn't he? Because he's a Law-keeping Jew. It had
to be kosher or Peter wouldn't eat it. And then a little later he gets up
to the house of Cornelius and he is full of trepidation, and I've always put it
this way. From Joppa, where the Lord revealed all this to Peter until he gets
up to the house of Cornelius, some 80-90 miles up the coast, I've always said
there must have been heel prints in the sand where the Lord just pushed him and
pushed him because Peter didn't want to go. No more than Jonah did.
And so he gets to the door of Cornelius' house and still full of trepidation,
what's the last thing he said before he steps in? He said, "Now Cornelius,
you know it's an unlawful thing for me, a Jew, to keep company with a man of
another nation." Well why does he say something like that if he's set
free? He wasn't set free. He was still a Law-keeping Jew. Now those same
kind of believing Jews who were under Peter's control there at Jerusalem, they
had maintained a separation but they were still Temple worshippers. You can't
ever prove to me that they weren't. And they were still legalistic Jews, but
they had recognized Christ as the Messiah. Now back to Acts 15.
Acts 15:1
"And certain men which came down from Judaea taught the brethren,
(these Gentile brethren) and said, (now look at it carefully
because you're Bible says it as sure as mine) `Except
(unless) ye be circumcised after the manner of Moses, ye cannot be
saved.'"
That's what your Bible says. But it's quoting these Jewish people from
Jerusalem who are now up there in the Gentile area of Antioch. They were saying
you couldn't be saved by Paul's Gospel. Does that sound familiar? You bet it
does! We don't use circumcision as a prerequisite today, but, instead, use a
host of other things. People will tell you that you can't be saved by what Les
is teaching. You've got to do this and that. Hey, there's no difference. Read
on:
Acts 15:2
"When therefore (because of this kind of false teaching coming
into their midst, which Paul had to constantly refute) Paul and Barnabas
had no small dissension (arguing with them) and disputation with
them, they (all of them together) determined that Paul and
Barnabas, and certain other of them, should go up to Jerusalem (to
Peter and the eleven) unto the apostles and elders about this
question."
Now jump all the way down to verse 5. They get to Jerusalem and they ride into
this big meeting of the Jerusalem believers, that believe, for
salvation, that Jesus was the Christ - the ones that Saul had been trying to
stamp out.
Acts 15:5a
"But there rose up certain of the sect of the Pharisees (what
kind of Pharisees?) which believed..."
They had embraced Jesus of Nazareth as their Messiah. They're not the whited
sepulchers who were religious, but had nothing. No, these were Pharisees who
had seen the light that Christ was Who He said He was. That's what it says,
"they were Pharisees who believed." Now continuing on.
Acts 15:5b
"...saying, That it was needful to circumcise them, and to command them
to keep the law of Moses."
Not only were they to be circumcised, they were to be commanded, like I pointed
out in Matthew 10:5 that Jesus did to the Twelve. He commanded them to go
not into the way of the Gentile. These Pharisees are commanding these
Gentile believers of Paul's Gospel, based on faith alone, that not only were
they to practice circumcision, but they have to keep the Law. They have to
keep the Law or they couldn't be saved. Now reading on. And here is the bone of
contention between the Jerusalem Jewish believers and these Gentile converts
that Paul has now won up there in Antioch.
Acts 15:6
"And the apostles and the elders came together for to consider of this
matter."
Can you see the argument? Listen, we've got to understand this
because this is where Christianity is at today. We are being deluged with these
same demands. "Oh yeah, we believe the gospel, but it's not enough alone.
You've got to do this and that. You have to come this way or that way."
Listen, Paul's gospel will have none of it. God, through Christ in this Age
of Grace, will have none of it. And we'll see that later when we get to
Galatians Chapter 5. But here was the need for this counsel to consider this.
And now let's come back to Galatians Chapter 2. So, here we are at 51 AD It's a
long time after Pentecost. That makes about 22 years after Pentecost, and they
are still debating, "Can you be saved by faith alone? Or do you have to keep
the Law of Moses and practice circumcision." Now verse 2:
Galatians 2:2a
"And I went up by revelation, (the Lord spoke it. Evidently the
Lord told Paul, `Now Paul it's time to get up to Jerusalem and confront the
Twelve. We have to settle this matter, otherwise we'll never be able to move
out into the Gentile world.') and communicated unto them that gospel
(if you don't mind, underline the word `that.' You might say
that's not an important word, but in this verse it's all important. Because it
was that Gospel ) which I preached among the Gentiles,..."
Not just that Jesus was the Christ as Peter preached, but now that he also
died for your sins, He was buried, and He rose from the grave for
you.
_______
LESSON THREE * PART III
THE GOSPEL OF THE CIRCUMCISION AND THE GOSPEL OF THE UNCIRCUMCISION
GALATIANS 1:15 - 2:9
Now we're here for Bible study we always say, so we're going to buy up the time
and use every minute for searching the Scriptures and we trust that you will
learn how to study. Now we're in Galatians Chapter 2, and here we find this
Church that Paul had started in Galatia was having a problem. Remember this
little letter was written primarily to straighten out the false teaching by
Judaisers of attaching Law-keeping and circumcision to Paul's Gospel of Grace.
Now here as we saw in our last lesson, some 22 years after Pentecost in about
51 AD., Paul has already established Churches throughout Asia Minor. We know
that the Church at Antioch has been more or less the home base. It's where
Gentiles were first called Christians, and where they were first interested in
the things of God.
So consequently it's at Antioch that this matter really boiled over to the
place that the Lord instructed Paul to go up to Jerusalem and meet with the
apostles and elders of the Jewish congregation. I refuse to call those
Jewish believers Christians simply because the Bible doesn't. Now I know
that I stand alone out there and that's all right because like I've always told
people that come to my classes, "I have never taught anywhere, classes or even
on television with the idea of having any monetary return. So I don't have to
worry if people like it or don't like it. I told one gentlemen one night, "It
fine with me if you don't want to come back to the class, it's no skin off my
nose." But you know what? He came back to the class a couple of weeks later and
he became one of my best students.
So I feel the same way here. I can take my stand on some of these things
without compromise because I only have ONE that I'm responsible to, and that's
the Author of this Book. I handle this Book realizing what a tremendous
responsibility it is. It doesn't matter whether you're a Sunday school
teacher, or whether you're going to just hold a devotion in your women's group
or whatever. Never forget that when you handle the Word of God that it's an
awesome responsibility, and I never forget that. We appreciate the letters
and phone calls of encouragement that we receive. I do feel that Paul and
Barnabas as they now come from Antioch and they're going to try to prove to the
leadership at Jerusalem that you cannot add anything to the relationship
between Christ and the believer except faith and faith alone in Paul's
Gospel.
Now when we left off in our last lesson we were in verse 2, and I hope that I
made the point that when he says-
Galatians 2:2a
"And I went up by revelation, and communicated..."
In other words they didn't just flippantly say, "Well this is what we believe."
But rather they sat down and they looked at it point by point. Line upon line,
because these revelations that came through the apostle Paul are so far above
and beyond Judaism that it took some time for these people to understand where
Paul was coming from. Those of you who remember my teachings back in Romans
1:16 where Paul says:
Romans 1:16a
"For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it (the
Gospel) is the power of God unto salvation..."
And what does salvation imply according to Paul's teachings? It's that whole
body of truth that involves justification, sanctification, forgiveness,
redeemed, baptized by the Holy Spirit into the Body of Christ, indwelt by the
Holy Sprit, and you can just go on and on and on. These are all new revelations
that you won't find until you get to Paul's writings. You don't find that
taught in the Old Testament. You don't find the Old Testament believer told,
"The Spirit dwelleth within you." Do you? No. Abraham was told that he was
justified by faith and faith alone, but he's the only one of the Jews back
there told that. The reason is, all of this has to be after the Cross and the
resurrection had been completed. So Paul communicated carefully, line upon
line, precept upon precept that Gospel.
Galatians 2:2a
"And I went up by revelation, and communicated unto them that gospel
which I preach among the Gentiles.
Now why does the Holy Spirit prompt the man to use the word "that
gospel?" Well to signify the difference between Paul's Gospel, and what
Peter and Jesus and the eleven had been teaching to Israel. Now you've heard me
many times make the statement that Jesus and the Twelve operated under the
Gospel of the Kingdom. And the Gospel of the Kingdom was just simply that the
King is here, He is ready to set up the Kingdom offered to Israel since Abraham
was given the Covenant. And that whole scope of that Kingdom message was "That
Jesus of Nazareth is the Christ, the Messiah of Israel."
But now you see the Gospel of Grace is "That this same Messiah of Israel Who
was crucified, shed His Blood, was buried, and rose from the dead is the
Savior, not just for Israel, but of the whole human race." Not to those who
keep the Law, not to those who do something for salvation, but to those who
simply believe. Oh, that was a whole new concept and these believing
Jews couldn't comprehend it, so they have to bring Paul to Jerusalem. Now
reading on in verse 2.
Galatians 2:2a
"And I went up by revelation, and communicated unto them that gospel
which I preach among the Gentiles, but privately (probably a small room
where just the leaders were present) to them which were of
reputation,..."
The leadership, and that would include Peter and the eleven, and maybe a few of
the Jewish elders of that assembly. And so they were more or less in a separate
room by themselves first, as Paul was delineating that Gospel which he was
preaching to those Gentiles, and it leaves out circumcision, and Law-keeping.
But the opposition couldn't see that that was the way to do it. Now verse 3.
Galatians 2:3
"But neither Titus, who was with me, being a Greek, was compelled
(or forced) to be circumcised:"
At least Paul and Barnabas held them at bay on that point. They weren't going
to circumcise Titus in order for him to be part of this great counsel meeting.
Now verse 4.
Galatians 2:4a
"And that because of false brethren unawares brought in,..."
Now these false brethren didn't sneak in, but rather the leaders no doubt had
something to do with it because they were brought in. Now that's why I'm a
stickler for every word. Now if that word brought wasn't in there then I
could say, Peter wasn't aware of these people, but I think he was. Somebody was
influential in bringing these people into this great counsel meeting of the
Jewish believers at Jerusalem to confront Paul and Barnabas and Titus, but
primarily Paul and Barnabas.
Galatians 2:4a
"And that because of false brethren unawares..."
Now there is another scripture that uses that same word unawares, and
let's look at it for a moment. It's in the little Book of Jude. So when false
teaching slips into a congregation or a denomination, it's nothing new. The
writers of Scriptures were already aware of it.
Jude 1:3,4
"Beloved, when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common
salvation, it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort you that ye
should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the
saints. 4. For there are certain men (not a lot of them, but enough of
them) crept in unawares, (a false teacher will never come into
your Church, and say, "OK folks I'm going to give you a little poison to go
along with the good stuff." So what does he do? He comes in perfectly
sanctioned, he's got all the credentials, but he's a false teacher. And this
has been a warning from day one.) who were before of old ordained to this
condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness and
denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ."
Does that sound familiar? Sure it does. And yet the gullible just can't see the
difference. And that's what they are, they're gullible. Oh, these men may sound
like they have all the answers, they may be polished, they may be like an
Apollos. They may have all the knowledge that makes me look like what I really
am - just an uneducated cow man, but they are false teachers, and they are
leading people astray. Now coming back to the Book of Galatians and you'll see
that same word and they're using the same mode of operation. They will bring
false teachers in without the whole congregation knowing who they are. And look
what they do.
Galatians 2:4
"And that because of false brethren unawares brought in, who came in
privily (or secretly) to spy out our liberty which we have in
Christ Jesus, that thy might bring us into bondage."
Now what do you suppose Paul is talking about when he says "Liberty?" Well,
that he was no longer under the demands of the Mosaic Law. They were set at
liberty from that. Now I don't want to get risqué, but we've got to face
facts as to how life was back in those days. Not every home had a private
shower and bath, so most people had to go to public baths. Well, when these
false brethren would go to these baths and there was an uncircumcised Gentile
such as Titus, do you think they're blind? Why they could pick that out in a
moment. So the whole idea here that these Jews were going to slip in and spy on
Paul and Barnabas, especially with their relationship with Titus who was a
Gentile, to check them out and make sure that they were practicing
circumcision. They probably watched how they ate. Are they eating kosher food,
and it was all done to just submarine the apostle and sink him? That's all they
have on their mind, they want to sink the apostle Paul. They want him to be
absolutely put out of business rather than go out to the Gentiles with the
message that he's been preaching. Now reading on:
Galatians 2:4b
"...that they (these Judaisers, although most are Kingdom
believers in Christ as the Messiah) might bring us into
bondage:"
They actually wanted Paul to say, "OK fellows you win, you win, I'll go back to
my congregations and I'll just tell them, OK folks I've had it all wrong. I'm
sorry I've been teaching you wrong, I guess we're going to have to give in. Go
ahead and practice your circumcision if that's what you want to do. Go ahead
and keep the dietary laws, keep the Law of Moses for after all I was wrong."
But you see that's not Paul! Now let's read on in verse 5. Now the real
Paul stands up:
Galatians 2:5
"To whom (that is the leaders of the Jerusalem congregation)
we gave place by subjection, (do you know what that means?
Pressure. Paul was under pressure from these Jerusalem leaders to get rid of
this idea that your converts don't have to keep the Law of Moses.) no,
not for an hour; (Paul didn't weaken one bit, why?) that the
truth of the gospel might continue with you."
Now he's writing to Gentiles remember so he's writing to you and I. He's
rehearsing what he went through. And what was the purpose he fought so hard for
us? So that Gentiles could continue to literally revel in the Grace of God
without being weighed down with all of the burdens of Law-keeping. Now you want
to remember that any kind of religion is a burden. That's why that most of your
Oriental religions, in particular their whole format for keeping people under
their thumb, is superstition. They keep people scared to death that if they
don't do exactly what their religion commands then they're in trouble. Bring it
into any kind of a legalistic system and it's the same way they keep people
under their thumb, and that's not freedom. Let's look at that in Galatians
Chapter 5:1 And this is what he's talking about and fighting so hard for us
that we would never have to give up a verse like this.
Galatians 5:1
"Stand fast therefore in the liberty (the freedom)
wherewith Christ (in His finished work and power of resurrection)
hath made us free, (we have liberty) and be not entangled
again with the yoke of bondage."
That yoke of bondage was what the Law was. Judaism was the religion of Christ's
day, and pretty much the extent of Orthodox Judaism today. But what were the
roots of Judaism? Well the pure Mosaic and Levitical Law that you had back
there in the time of Moses. But the religion degenerated, and as they came up
through the centuries, and the Rabbi's begin to make comments on the various
portions of the Old Testament, it just gradually became watered down from its
original purity. I'm not saying this with any criticism of the present day
Jewish religion, but truth is truth. So it had degenerated down to a religion,
and that's why Paul called it that in Chapter 1:13 at the time of Christ. It
was no longer resting on the Ten Commandments and the Torah, but it had become
613 rules and regulations.
Now can you imagine living 24 hours a day under the constant pressure of 613
rules? Why you couldn't take a breath without breaking one of them. And yet
they had to be scared to death of what the religion would demand of them if
they broke one of these 613 commandments. Now Paul is saying that we've been
set free from all of that. Now let's turn on into the Book of Colossians, and
this is one of my favorite verses. Oh what beautiful language we have here. I
hope the new versions don't take this out, but leave it just like it is. Paul,
writing to Gentiles up there in Asia Minor writes:
Colossians 2:14
"Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances (what do you suppose
that was? 613 of them.) that was against us, which was contrary to us ,
and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross;"
See that finished it. The Cross was the end of the Law, and we must never
forget that. And yet so much of our preaching and teaching today is in that
area before the Cross. And that's why they can hang onto all this legalism.
That's why they can hang on to all the commandments because they are not
recognizing that the Cross completely finished it. The Lord Himself nailed
those things to the Cross. Yes including the Ten Commandments. We're not under
their binding power. Now we're under their moral principles. Absolutely we are.
We still live under the moral code of the Ten Commandments, I'll never take
that away. In fact Paul makes that so clear in Romans Chapter 13. It's so
obvious that they still have a valid role in our Christian experience. But it's
not a religious dogma.
Romans 13:8,9
"Owe no man any thing, but to love one another: for he that loveth
another hath (already) fulfilled the law.
(the work of the Cross was love epitomized. It was God's love for mankind that
nailed Him to the Cross. And as a result He fulfilled the demands of the Law)
9. For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou
shall not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness. Thou shalt not covet; and
if there be any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying,
namely, thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself."
That obvious enough isn't it? But it's not a legalistic, pressurized system
whereby we have to say, "Oh I don't dare do that. I can't do that because there
is a law against it." No we've been set free. But like I always say, "That's
not license." As soon as we come under this law of love we no longer want to
break these commandments. We have now the indwelling Holy Spirit who directs
our thinking and actions. Now that is not to say that we're going to be
sinless, because we're human. And as long as we're here in the flesh we're
still going to fail, but the Lord has made provisions for that. Now coming back
to Galatians Chapter 2, and again I want to look at verse 5. Let verse 5 just
sink into your thinking. Paul is under pressure to give up this Gospel of
Grace, and add Law-keeping and circumcision, but he says:
Galatians 2:5
"To whom we gave place by subjection, no, not for an hour; (today
I guess we'd say not for a minute) that the truth of the gospel
(Paul's Gospel) might continue with you.".
Now just stop and think? What if Paul would have given up?
_______
LESSON THREE * PART IV
THE GOSPEL OF THE CIRCUMCISION AND THE GOSPEL OF THE UNCIRCUMCISION
GALATIANS 1:15 - 2:9
Now to pick up where we left off in Galatians Chapter 2, and remember this
little Book was written to clarify that we're not under Law, but rather Grace,
and never lose sight of that. It was written to Gentile congregations and so it
is just as appropriate for you and I today Now we had just finished our
comments on verse 5 in the last lesson, and remember the setting. The Church up
in Antioch, which was up in Syria, has become predominately Gentile where Paul
and Barnabas have now been laboring as well as moving out from Antioch into the
Gentile world of Asia Minor and Greece. But everywhere they go their little
congregations are constantly being subjected to the Judaisers who are trying to
bring them under the Law of Moses. They are claiming that Paul's converts
cannot be saved unless they keep the Law of Moses, practice circumcision, and
so forth.
So finally after many, many years this all comes to a head, and Paul and
Barnabas, by the Lord's own direction sends them up to Jerusalem to confront
Peter and the hierarchy there. So this is what Paul is rehearsing in Galatians
Chapter 2. Now we're going to take just a moment here in Galatians and we're
going to go back and pick up Luke's account of this same meeting in Acts
Chapter 15. Now verse 6:
Galatians 2:6
"But of these who seemed to be somewhat,..."
Now read that carefully, what does that tell you? What does that imply. Hey,
they are not what they thought they were. Now I'm not being disrespectful of
Peter and the eleven. No way. I'm going to be just as anxious to see Peter,
James, and John and the rest of them as anybody else. But in the whole economy
of things, here they have been promoting Christ as the Messiah of Israel, and
His coming Kingship, and His Kingdom, but Israel is rejecting it. Now that
wasn't Peter's fault. He had done all he could. He had preached his heart out
all through those early Chapters of Acts. But Israel could not believe that
anything good could come out of Nazareth. Well in God's Divine purposes then as
Israel kept slipping and slipping away in unbelief, then naturally Peter and
the eleven and these Jewish leaders of Jerusalem were losing their clout.
Because the whole system was falling through the cracks. But God isn't going to
be out of it, so as Israel is slipping in unbelief, rejecting all this, God has
now turned to what people? Well the Gentiles. So as the Jews are going dow, the
Gentiles are coming up, and this is Paul's ministry. Looking at verse 6
again:
Galatians 2:6a
"But of these who seemed to be somewhat,..."
These had to be the Twelve and the elders of the congregation at Jerusalem, but
they no longer had the power, rightfully, as God had entrusted to them. Let me
show you what I'm talking about. Come with me to the Book of Acts Chapter 4,
and again watch every word of this. Let's begin with verse 32, and much the
same thing has taken place in Chapter 2. Where they begin to have all things
common, and they lived out of what I call the common kitty. Now this kitty is
still operating in Chapter 4 which is probably a year or two later.
Acts 4:32-37
"And the multitude of them that believed (that is of these Jews
now at Jerusalem) were of one heart and of one soul: neither said any of
them that ought of the things which he possessed was his own; but they had all
things common. (in other words they took all their wealth, whatever
they had, and they brought it into a common kitty.) 33. And with great
power (don't miss that) gave the apostles witness of the
resurrection of the Lord Jesus: and great grace was upon them all,.
34. Neither was there any among them that lacked: (remember there
was thousands of these Jewish believers that were living out of this kitty.)
for as many as were possessors of lands or houses sold them, and brought
the prices of the things that were sold, 35. And laid them down
at the apostles' feet:(because they were in control) and
distribution was made unto every man according as he had need.
(Remember they were waiting for Christ to come back and set up His
Kingdom) 36. And Joses, who by the apostles was surnamed
Barnabas, (same Barnabas that was in Galatians Chapter 2 with Paul)
(which is being interpreted, The son of consolation,) a Levite, and of
the country of Cyprus, 37. Having land, sold it, and brought the money, and
laid it at the apostles' feet."
Even Barnabas, that good man who was probably coming up in the leadership, he,
too, laid every penny of what he had gotten for his sold real-estate at the
feet of the apostles. They were in control, they were the leadership. Now it's
these same apostles that Paul by inspiration of the Holy Spirit is led to say
for our purposes:
Galatians 2:6
"But of these who seemed to be somewhat, (whatsoever they were, it maketh
no matter to me: God accepteth no man's person:) (so in God's view
Peter was no greater than anybody else.) for they who seemed to be
somewhat in conference added nothing to me:"
Something else to remember is that when you see Scripture repeat something, as
you see in this verse it being repeated for emphasis, He's driving the point
home that these men no longer had the preeminence of God's dealing with the
human race that they had enjoyed back in the earthly ministries and the early
days of Acts. It was slipping away from them. And the reason Paul says at the
end of verse 6 "that in conference added nothing to me," was because they had
no comprehension of these revelations that the apostle Paul had been receiving
from the ascended Lord. They knew only Jesus in the flesh, they knew Jesus that
40 days in Acts after His resurrection of course, but they knew nothing of the
ascended Lord. And Paul had received all of his from the ascended Lord in
glory. Now one more verse and we've got to go back to Acts Chapter 15.
Galatians 2:7
"But contrariwise, (or on the other hand) when they
(the Twelve in particular) saw that the gospel of the
uncircumcision (the Gentiles) was committed unto me, as the
gospel of the circumcision (Jew) was unto Peter;"
Now you know that because we saw that four lessons ago. Jesus chose the
Twelve, and He commanded them in Matthew 10:5,6 not to go to a Gentile but go
only to lost sheep of the house of Israel. So the Twelve were apostles of what
people? Israel! You know I've said as long as I've been teaching that you
can't show me one record from scripture that these Twelve men ever had a
ministry among the Gentiles. Now I won't take away the fact that they may have
visited with the Gentiles, as we know Peter went up to Antioch. But to
actually have a ministry among the Gentiles there's not a word of record of
that in this Book. They were the apostles of Israel and the Jews, and they
understood that. A lot of people today don't understand that, but those Twelve
men did.
So in verse 7 again, Paul says that the Twelve are now beginning to understand
that as he was given the Gospel for the Gentiles (I Corinthians 15:1-4) it was
from the same God, and the same kind of authority that they had received the
Gospel of the circumcision or the Jews which was the Gospel of the Kingdom. Now
come back to Acts 15 and we've mentioned before that this will be Luke's
account of the same thing we find in Galatians Chapter 2 which is Paul's
account in the first person. But now look what Luke writes in Acts Chapter 15.
We've already looked at a few of the early verses in the chapter. But let's
jump in at verse 5 and review it.
Acts 15:5-7a
"But there rose up certain of the sect of the Pharisees which believed,
saying, That it was needful to circumcise them, and to command them to keep the
law of Moses. 6. And the apostles and elders came together for to consider this
matter. 7. And when there had been (past tense) much
disputing,..."
Now I don't know how long this disputing went on, and again with no disrespect
to our Jewish people, have you ever seen two or three Jews get into an
argument? I tell you what, it's interesting. I know we've had it happen in the
hotel in Jerusalem, and even though we couldn't understand a word they said, I
know that the fur would have liked to have flown. Because they can really get
after it, and I bet they did here also. There was much disputing, and they
weren't making any bones about what they believed. Now reading on:
Acts 15:7a
"And when there had been much disputing, Peter rose up,..."
Now I'd like to make a point of words. If he rose up he must have been seated.
Now in the midst of all this disputing I have to think that these Jews weren't
just seated in a conference room, but they were nose to nose standing, and
going at this tooth and toenail. And remember in Galatians Chapter 2, Paul said
"that he would not give in for a minute." Then all of a sudden Peter, who had
been over there seated nonchalantly, just sort of taking it all in, and not all
that interested, finally is nudged by the Holy Spirit, Who says, "Peter get up,
come on speak up." So that's what happened.
Acts 15:7b
"...Peter rose up and said unto them, `Men and brethren, ye know how that
a good while ago (12 years) God made choice among us, that the
Gentiles by my mouth should hear the word of the gospel, and
believe.'"
What's Peter referring to? Chapter 10 of Acts, the house of Cornelius. And you
all remember that account. How that Peter and 6 other Jewish believers went up
to the Gentile home of the Roman officer Cornelius. And while Peter hadn't even
finished preaching, hadn't said a word yet about repenting and being baptized,
what happened? The Holy Spirit came down and signified to those 7 Jews that
those Gentiles had become believers. Without an invitation, without walking
down an aisle, without repenting, without baptizing, all of a sudden Peter was
just stopped in his tracks, and here these Gentiles are evidencing their
salvation by faith, and faith alone.
It was not yet Paul's Gospel, but rather only that Jesus was the Christ, but
they had believed it, and the Holy Spirit came upon those Gentiles evidenced
with tongues, which was a manifestation that the Holy Spirit had come upon
them. And Peter had to just stop for moment he was flabbergasted, and as he was
thinking, "Hey, this isn't the right order of salvation. This isn't the way
it's supposed to go. My goodness I should have been able to say, `Have you
repented? I have to be able to baptize you, and then the Holy Spirit would
come.'" But none of that happened. Some of you are looking at me with kind of a
blank stare. It's been a long time since we covered that so let's look at it
for a moment in Acts Chapter 10.
Now verse 43, and Peter is in the home of Cornelius. We don't know how many
Gentiles were there, it was a household so it couldn't have been that many. It
was probably his immediately family, and maybe some of his closest Roman
officers, I don't know, but anyhow Peter has now been preaching, and hasn't
said a word about the work of the Cross for salvation like Paul would have
done, but all Peter could rehearse is that this Jesus of Nazareth who had
appeared to the Nation of Israel, had been crucified, killed but had been
raised from the dead and was alive. So Peter says:
Acts 10:43
"To him give all the prophets witness, that through his name
(see, not through his finished work of the Cross. Peter as yet does not know
Paul's Gospel, but Peter does know that the name of Jesus of Nazareth, the
Messiah, the Son of God was the vehicle for salvation so he says)
whosoever believeth in him shall receive remission of sins. (he hasn't
said a word about repenting, he hasn't said a word about baptizing. But look
what happened.) 44. While Peter yet spake these words, (he's
still preaching and) the Holy Ghost fell on all them which heard the
word. (why? They had become believers. They had believed what Peter was
saying.) 45. And they of the circumcision (remember there were
six Jews that went with Peter) which believed were astonished,
as many as came with Peter, because that on the Gentiles also was poured
out the gift of the Holy Ghost."
Hey, if Gentiles had been saved for the past eight years since Pentecost why
would they have been astonished? But Gentiles haven't been saved. This is the
very first instance, and it was an astonishing fact to them that Gentiles could
be saved without adhering to the rituals of Judaism, and proselytizing. But
here they simply believed and the Holy Spirit manifested their faith, and then
Peter had to hurry up and try to get the horse back up in front of the cart so
what does he say? "Oh, we've got to baptize them." That sounds familiar also
doesn't it.
Acts 10:47
"Can any man forbid water, that these should not be baptized, which have
received the Holy Ghost as well as we?"
Now let's go back because you always have to compare Scripture with Scripture
or you won't know what I'm driving at. Come back to Chapter 2, and verse 38.
It's obvious what it says, you don't have to be a theologian, Anybody can
understand what this verse says. Remember here Peter is speaking only to
Jews.
Acts 2:36
"Therefore let all the house of Israel know assuredly, that God hath made
that same Jesus, whom ye have crucified, both Lord and Christ." (then
verse 38)
Acts 2:38
"Then Peter said unto them, (1) `Repent, and be
(2) baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for
the (3) remission of sins, and ye shall receive the
(4) gift of the Holy Ghost.'"
Now you don't have to be a seminary professor to understand that. That was the
criteria. They were to repent, they were to be baptized in water, they would
receive forgiveness of sins, and then the Holy Spirit would come upon them. The
four steps. Now come back to Chapter 10 for a moment, and see how that has been
totally reversed when you get into the Gentile economy. Now remember this is
just the first step of opening the door to Gentiles.
Acts 10:44
"While Peter yet spake these words, the Holy Ghost fell on all them which
heard the word."
Peter hadn't said a word about repentance, he hadn't said a word about baptism,
and while he spoke, merely concerning Who Jesus was, and what had happened to
Him they believed it and the Holy Spirit came upon as evidence of their faith.
Without baptism, without repentance, what did they do? They just believed. And
just believing is Paul Gospel, but this is merely the beginning of it. Now come
back to Acts Chapter 15 and this is what Peter is making reference to.
Acts 15:7a
"And when there had been much disputing, Peter rose up, and said unto
them, `Men and brethren, ye know how that a good while ago...'"
How long ago? 12 years according to my reckoning. Now normally you would think
that Peter and those six Jews saw what could happen if you would just approach
Gentiles with the Gospel. They would have just gone out across the Roman
empire. But they didn't, but rather where did they go? Back to Jerusalem. And
when they got there they got called on the carpet for going to the Gentiles in
Acts 11:1-3.
Acts 11:1-3
"And the apostles, and brethren that were in Judaea heard that the
Gentiles had also received the word of God. 2. And when Peter was come up to
Jerusalem, they that were of the circumcision contended with him, 3. Saying,
`Thou wentest in to men uncircumcised, and didst eat with them.'"
Then Peter had to calm them down by saying in effect, "God showed us that He
was in it." But then they all forgot about it. For 12 years there was not
another mention of these Gentiles in the house of Cornelius being saved until
now in Chapter 15. Here is where I like the Sovereign working of a Sovereign
God. I maintain that yes, God wanted the house of Cornelius to be saved, but
what was the bigger purpose? To come to Paul's defense in this counsel in
Jerusalem. If Peter would not have remembered what had happened at the house of
Cornelius, they never would have let Paul go back to Antioch with freedom to
preach his Gospel. They would plagued him every inch of the way. But they
didn't because Peter realized- "Hey, 12 years ago God showed me He could save
Gentiles without going through all we demand." Now look at it again in the
text.
Acts 15:7
"And when there had been much disputing, Peter rose up, and said unto
them, `Men and brethren, ye know how that a good while ago God made choice
among us, (that is Peter himself) that the Gentiles by my mouth
should hear the word of the gospel, and believe.'"
It doesn't say to repent and be baptized. It says that they should believe. Now
verse 8.
Acts 15:8-10
"And God, which knoweth the hearts, bare them witness, (to show
Peter that God had done it.) giving them the Holy Ghost, even as he did
unto us; 9. And put no difference between us and them, purifying
their hearts by faith. (Now Peter says in recollection, in realizing
what God tried to show me-) 10. Now therefore why tempt
(test) ye God, to put a yoke upon the neck of the disciples,
(these believers up in Antioch) which neither our fathers nor we
were able to bear?"
That was the Law. That was a burden, see? Then in verse 11 Peter says, "Paul's
right!"
Acts 15:11
"But we believe that through the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ we shall
be saved, even as they."
Now I'm going to make a comment, as we go back to Galatians Chapter 2. I'm sure
that Peter forgot 90% of what he said in that verse in the years to come.
Because he still could not give into the fact that Paul's Gospel had now
superseded his Gospel and position. And that's why he writes in his little
Epistle of II Peter:
II Peter 3:15-16a
"And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our
beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written
unto you; 16. As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these
things; (of salvation in verse 15) in which are some things hard
to be understood,..."
I don't think Peter ever fully understood Paul's Gospel of Grace. Now let's
finish the lesson with verse 9 of Galatians Chapter 2.
Galatians 2:9
"And when James, Cephas (Peter) and John, who seemed to be
pillars, perceived the grace that was given unto me, they gave to me and
Barnabas the right hands of fellowship; that we should go unto the heathen,
(Gentiles) and they unto the circumcision, (Jews).
Copyright © 1998 Les Feldick Ministries. All rights reserved.